首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Geotechnical Safety Risk >LRFD Code Development for Foundation Structures in Korea- Reliability Analysis of Static Bearing Capacity Evaluation of Driven Steel Pipe Piles
【24h】

LRFD Code Development for Foundation Structures in Korea- Reliability Analysis of Static Bearing Capacity Evaluation of Driven Steel Pipe Piles

机译:LRFD代码开发,用于韩置钢管桩静态承载力评价静态承载力评价的韩材可靠性分析

获取原文

摘要

Reliability analyses of the static bearing capacity analysis methods for driven steel pipe piles adopted in the Korean Standards for Foundation Structures have been performed as part of the efforts to develop the Load and Resistance Factor Design Code for foundation structures in Korea. Over 2,000 static load test data on driven steel pipe piles were collected from all around the country. After review of the load-displacement curves, subsurface investigation reports, and other related documents, only 43 load test data were found to be useful for the reliability analysis. These load test piles were sorted into two cases: pile tip on soil case and pile tip on rock case. Resistance bias factor statistics of each pile tip case were evaluated for the two static design methods. Reliability analysis was performed by two types of First Order Reliability Methods, Mean Value First Order Second (MVFOSM) method and Advanced First Order Second (AFOSM) method. AFOSM method resulted in a little larger reliability indices than MVFOSM method, but the difference was not significant.
机译:韩国基础结构采用的驱动钢管桩的可靠性分析已经进行了韩国基础结构标准的一部分,是开发韩国基础结构的负载和电阻因子设计规范的努力。从全国各地收集驱动钢管桩上的超过2,000个静态负载测试数据。在审查负载位移曲线,地下调查报告和其他相关文件之后,发现43个负载测试数据仅对可靠性分析有用。将这些载荷试验桩分为两种情况:土壤壳体上的桩尖,岩壳上的桩尖。为两个静态设计方法评估了每个桩尖壳的电阻偏压统计。通过两种类型的第一订单可靠性方法进行可靠性分析,平均值第一阶二(MVFOSM)方法和高级第一阶(AFOSM)方法。 AFOSM方法导致比MVFOSM方法更大的可靠性指数,但差异不显着。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号