首页> 外文会议>International Workshop on Digital Mammography(IWDM 2006) >Contrast Threshold of 4 Full Field Digital Mammography Systems Using Different Measurement Methods
【24h】

Contrast Threshold of 4 Full Field Digital Mammography Systems Using Different Measurement Methods

机译:使用不同测量方法的4个全场数字乳腺X线摄影系统的对比度阈值

获取原文

摘要

We compared three conspicuity tests applied to four full field digital mammography (FFDM) systems. The tests included: 1) the calculation of noise equivalent quanta (NEQ); 2) contrast-detail analysis with the CDMAM 3.4 phantom and 3) evaluation of the detectability of (simulated) microcal-cifications with specific well-known dimensions in mastectomy images. For each contrast-resolution test method, the exposure, processing and viewing conditions were identical. As a result, the only variable for a given test was the physical performance of the detector. The three test methods each rank the detectors in the same order. The flat-panel detector ranked the best overall, the dual-sided read-out storage phosphor detector ranked second and the single-sided-read-out storage phosphor detectors with 50 μm and 100 μm pixel sizes ranked similarly and were inferior to the other 2 detectors.
机译:我们将三个将应用于四个全场数字乳房X线摄影(FFDM)系统的三个光临试验。该测试包括:1)噪声等价量子(NEQ)的计算; 2)与CDMAM 3.4幻像的对比度分析和3)评估(模拟)微型尺寸在乳房切除术图像中具有特定众所周知的尺寸的可检测性。对于每个对比分辨率测试方法,曝光,加工和观察条件是相同的。结果,给定测试的唯一变量是检测器的物理性能。三个测试方法每个测试方法以相同的顺序排列探测器。平板探测器排名最佳,双面读出储存磷光体探测器排名第二,单面读出储存磷光体探测器和50μm和100μm像素尺寸相似,差不多2个探测器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号