首页> 外文会议>EAGE Conference Exhibition >Utilization of the GRM (Geological Representative Models) to Integrate Different Types of Uncertainties in the Decision Making Process (SPE-120924)
【24h】

Utilization of the GRM (Geological Representative Models) to Integrate Different Types of Uncertainties in the Decision Making Process (SPE-120924)

机译:GRM(地质代表模型)的利用率在决策过程中整合不同类型的不确定性(SPE-120924)

获取原文

摘要

Decision analysis applied to the development of petroleum fields must take into account the risk associated to several types of uncertainties. The combination of these uncertainties can be used to quantify the risk related to the decision process. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the integration of different types of uncertainties, especially geological and economics on the complementary development project of an offshore field located 34 Km of Rio Grande do Norte coast in a water depth of 46 meters. It was applied a methodology, involving quantification of uncertainty and risk analysis (Costa, 2003), that proposes the use of models representing the geological uncertainties, called Geological Representative Models (GRM), to integrate with economic uncertainties (oil price, investment value, project start, etc.) and improved the decision making process of the project. In the risk methodology, many models are created and it is not viable to use all these models to integrate with other types of uncertainties. Therefore, some representative models are selected to continue the analysis. These models are selected based on the variation of net present value (NPV), oil production (Np), oil recovery (RF), water production (Wp), etc. The basic idea is to plot NPV (main objective function) against secondary objective-function (RF, Np, etc.) choosing models that are close to the values of P10, P50 and P90 that have significant variation in the other attributes. The adoption of this premise, which includes aspects of the amount and the speed of the recovery, is useful in sizing the later production facilities as well as in detailing the development plans and evaluating the flexibility of these plans. The adoption of this process as well as the use of an automated tool provided detailed information, contributing to the decision making process.
机译:应用于石油领域发展的决策分析必须考虑到与几种类型的不确定性相关的风险。这些不确定性的组合可用于量化与决策过程相关的风险。本研究的目的是评估不同类型的不确定性的整合,特别是地质和经济学对位于Rio Grande的34公里的离岸领域的互补开发项目,水深在46米的水深。它应用了一种方法论,涉及量化不确定性和风险分析(Costa,2003),提出使用代表地质不确定性的模型,称为地质代表模型(GRM),以与经济不确定性(油价,投资价值,项目开始等)并改进了项目的决策过程。在风险方法中,创建了许多模型,使用所有这些模型与其他类型的不确定性集成并不可行。因此,选择一些代表模型以继续分析。基于净目前值(N​​PV),石油生产(NP),石油恢复(RF),水产量(WP)等来选择这些模型。基本思想是将NPV(主要目标函数)绘制反对二级目标功能(RF,NP等)选择接近P10,P50和P90的值的模型,这些模型在其他属性中具有显着变化的差异。通过这一前提,其中包括金额的各个方面和恢复的速度,可用于调整后期的生产设施以及详细说明发展计划并评估这些计划的灵活性。采用此过程以及自动化工具的使用提供了详细信息,有助于决策过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号