首页> 外文会议>Annual Meeting of The Institute of Navigation >Attitude Performance Comparison Between Turret-mounted and Airframe-mounted INS Installations
【24h】

Attitude Performance Comparison Between Turret-mounted and Airframe-mounted INS Installations

机译:塔楼安装和机身安装INS安装的姿态性能比较

获取原文

摘要

There has recently been an increased interest in developing Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance and Persistent Surveillance capabilities from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). System developers responding to this need are faced with UAV restrictions in payload weight, volume and power and forced into a design tradeoff decision relating to number and placement of onboard inertial measurement units (IMUs). While it may be optimal to have two IMUs on board, one placed on the airframe to optimize navigation and the other attached to the imager platform within the turret to maximize performance in image registration, the more likely solution will force the developer to choose between one or the other. At issue, then, is the need to either de-couple platform gimbal angles, or else add them to the Inertial Navigation System (INS) state solution depending on which of the two IMU placement configurations is adopted. Measurements of the additional error in attitude estimation associated with numerically de-coupling (and adding) the turret gimbal angles have been obtained from dedicated flight tests aboard a small aircraft. Instrumentation included two identical BEI Systron Donner C-MIGITS III IMUs, one mounted on the airframe and the other next to a calibrated imaging system on a Atlantic Positioning Systems SPS-500 positioner. Controls for the test included a Post Processing Kinematic GPS on the airframe and surveyed ground targets. Flight geometries included straight, level-flight segments and orbits around fixed aim points. Measurements of camera position and attitude were obtained from each of the INS state solutions during these flights and referenced to ground-truth to obtain comparative performance estimations. Not surprisingly, the performance differences are most pronounced during periods of high winds when the 2σ-error distribution was 0.35 milliradian for the turret-mounted configuration and an estimated 0.50 milliradian for the airframe-mounted configuration.
机译:最近,有开发情报监视和无人驾驶飞行器(UAV)侦察和持久监视能力的兴趣增加。系统开发者响应于这种需求都面临着在UAV有效载荷重量,体积和功率限制,并被迫进入与数和车载惯性测量单元(IMU)的配置的设计权衡决定。虽然它可能是最佳的具有两个IMU的上板,一个放置在机身以优化导航和其他转台以最大化图像配准性能内连接到成像器平台,就越有可能的解决方案将迫使显影剂一个之间进行选择或其他。目前的问题的话,是需要或者脱钩平台万向节角度,或者将它们添加到这取决于两个IMU放置配置,采用惯性导航系统(INS)状态的解决方案。在姿态估计与数值解耦合(并加入)相关联的附加误差的测量转台万向节角具有从专用飞行测试一架小型飞机已经获得。仪器包括两个相同的BEI希创唐纳C-III MIGITS IMU的,一个安装在所述机体和所述其他旁边的一个校准的成像系统上的大西洋定位系统SPS-500定位。为测试控件包含在机身和调查的地面目标后处理GPS动态。飞行的几何形状包括直线,水平飞行段和轨道周围的固定目标点。这些飞行期间,两个INS状态的解决方案,获得并参照地面实况,以获得比较性能估计照相机位置和姿态的测量。不足为奇的是,性能差异在强风的时期最明显当2σ-误差分布为0.35毫弧度的刀架上安装的结构和估计的0.50毫弧度用于机身安装配置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号