首页> 外文会议>International Flow Measurement Conference >Bilateral Comparison in the Calibration of Atmospheric Tank Provers by Volumetric and Gravimetric Methods
【24h】

Bilateral Comparison in the Calibration of Atmospheric Tank Provers by Volumetric and Gravimetric Methods

机译:体积和重量法测定大气压罐中的双边比较

获取原文

摘要

Calibration of liquid quantity meters may be carried out volumetrically by collecting a known volume of liquid in a standard vessel. In this volumetric method, the standard vessel often known as atmospheric tank prover takes the form of a container with a calibrated volume. In its turn, calibration of the tank prover volume can be carried out by weighing the water contained in the vessel, or carried out using smaller volumetric measures which are themselves traceable to national standards by weighing methods. This paper presents a bilateral interlaboratory comparison in the calibration service of atmospheric tank provers carried out by Institute for Technological Research of the State of Sao Paulo (IPT) and Weights and Measures Institute of the State of Sao Paulo (IPEM-SP). The main objectives of the comparison were to validate the calibration results of two accredited laboratories and to comply with the requirements established by the accreditation standards regarding the participation of calibration laboratories in proficiency tests. Another important objective was to evaluate the comparability of the calibration methods used by the laboratories. IPT used the gravimetric weighting method and IPEM-SP used the volumetric method. The performances of the laboratories in the calibrations were quite satisfactory for both atmospheric tank provers used in the comparison. The normalized errors obtained were between 0.08 and 0.15 for the 20 L tank prover and 0.05 to 0.22 for the 1 000 L tank prover, indicating a very satisfactory comparability between the two calibration methods.
机译:液体量计的校准可以通过在标准容器中收集已知体积的液体来体积分叉进行。在该体积的方法中,通常称为大气坦克证报的标准容器采用校准体积的容器的形式。轮到轮罐玻璃体积的校准可以通过称量血管中包含的水进行,或者使用较小的体积措施进行,这本身通过称重方法可追溯到国家标准。本文介绍了由圣保罗州(IPT)和法律州(IPEM-SP)的权重和措施研究所进行的技术研究所的大气坦克普通校准服务中的双边互补性比较。比较的主要目标是验证两个认可实验室的校准结果,并遵守认证标准的要求,了解校准实验室在熟练程度中的参与。另一个重要目标是评估实验室使用的校准方法的可比性。 IPT使用重量加权方法和IPEM-SP使用了体积方法。对比较中使用的大气坦克普通的校准中的实验室的性能非常令人满意。对于20L坦克证报,所获得的归一化误差为0.08和0.15,为0.05至0.22,对于1 000升坦克证明,表明两种校准方法之间具有非常令人满意的可比性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号