首页> 外文会议>Multidisciplinary Conference >Judge Dillon and Karst: Limitations on Local Regulation of Karst Hazards
【24h】

Judge Dillon and Karst: Limitations on Local Regulation of Karst Hazards

机译:狄龙和喀斯特法官:关于喀斯特危险局部监管的限制

获取原文

摘要

Most often in the United States, regulation of land use falls to local governments. Similarly, local governments form the local focus of efforts to impose regulations to minimize karst hazards. In addition, the federal government and the states impose very little regulation on karst landscapes. However, the structure of the United States' federalist form of government often limits the authority of local governments to carry out this function. The powers of the federal government, as well as those of the states, are laid out in the United States Constitution. The Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides that, "[t]he powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." This provision at once greatly limits the powers of the federal government and places a great deal of power with the states. In addition to the federal and state governments, nearly 40,000 local governments exist in the U.S. However, the United States Constitution makes no mention of the power, if any, that should be given to these local governments. Consequently, settled law provides that local governments are mere creatures of, and under the total control of, state legislatures and state constitutions. Local governments must derive power from state constitutions, charters or enabling legislation passed by state legislative bodies. In this context, a struggle arose during the middle-1800's as to whether local governments should be vested with inherent broad powers or should be limited in authority. Judge John Dillon, an Iowa state court judge and municipal law expert, proved to be the most influential force in deciding this issues. Judge Dillon derived Dillon's Rule, which states that local governments only possess those powers expressly granted or inherently necessary to the local government. If any reasonable doubt exists, the courts resolve the doubt against the local government. The resulting constraints prove to drastically impact the scope of local government regulation in karst terrain. This paper reviews the use of Dillon's Rule across the country, finding that 39 states impose the rule, at least with respect to some local governments. The author then outlines the impact of limited local government on the regulation of karst hazards. For example, the Standard Zoning Enabling Act arguably fails to empower local governments to regulate land uses to mitigate and minimize karst hazards, include groundwater contamination. The paper concludes that many local governments lack authority to adequately regulate karst areas to protect water quality and minimize hazards. States must examine and expand existing enabling authority to authorize effective tools to manage these hazards in karst terrains.
机译:最常见于美国,土地使用的监管落到地方政府。同样,地方政府形成了努力施加规定以最大限度地减少喀斯特危险的努力的焦点。此外,联邦政府和各国对喀斯特景观施加了很少的规定。但是,美国的联邦主义政府的结构通常会限制地方政府的权威机构开展这一职能。联邦政府以及各国的权力在美国宪法中被规定。美国宪法的第十修正案规定,“[T]宪法未授权宪法的权力,也不禁止向各国禁止,分别为各国或人民保留。”这一规定立即极大地限制了联邦政府的权力,并对各国提供了大量权力。除联邦和州各国政府外,美国还存在近40,000个地方政府。然而,美国宪法没有提及应向这些地方政府提供的权力,如果有的话。因此,安定的法律规定,地方政府仅仅是国家立法机构和国家宪法的生物。地方政府必须从国家宪法,宪章或国家立法机构通过的立法产生权力。在这方面,在1800年代中期的斗争中出现了斗争,以及地方政府是否应归属于固有的广泛权,或者应该限制权威。伊瓦州法院法官和市政法官John Dillon法官被证明是决定这一问题的最具影响力的力量。狄龙法官派对狄龙的统治,这使地方政府仅拥有当地政府明确授予或本质所需的权力。如果存在任何合理的疑问,法院对当地政府的疑问决定了。由此产生的约束证明,喀斯特地形中当地政府监管的范围急剧影响。本文审查了狄龙统治全国范围内的使用,发现39个国家至少对一些地方政府征收规则。然后,作者概述了有限的地方政府有限的影响对喀斯特危险的监管。例如,标准分区能够使行动可以说可以赋予地方政府能够调节土地用于减轻和最小化喀斯特危险的土地,包括地下水污染。本文得出结论,许多地方政府缺乏有权充分调节喀斯特地区以保护水质,并尽量减少危害。各国必须审查和扩展现有的有利机构,以授权有效的工具来管理喀斯特地区的这些危险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号