首页> 外文会议>International Astronautical Congress >Privatization of Space Law Negotiating of Commercial and Benefit-Sharing Issues in the Utilization of Outer Space
【24h】

Privatization of Space Law Negotiating of Commercial and Benefit-Sharing Issues in the Utilization of Outer Space

机译:空间法谈判商业和惠益分享问题利用外太空的私有化

获取原文

摘要

Space law is not a "self-contained" body of law; its main source is international law. One of the important consequences of that is to make states the main actor in the utilization of outer space. As can be seen from the five space treaties, the original character of space law is public law that specifically governs state activities in outer space. However, the privatization and commercialization of outer space that has taken place intensively in the last two decades has also been followed by privatizing space law – directing space law to be more responsive to private and commercial issues. Article Ⅵ of Space Treaty allows non-governmental entities to engage in outer space activities. This means that privatization and commercialization of outer space activities are legally acceptable. This Article, however, does not make any limitations of which outer space activities that can be commercialized and which ones are not? If the Article will be read that all outer space activities can be commercialized, the main question is, whether it is not contrary to the basic spirit of the utilization of outer space: for the common interest of all mankind? In Addition, the Article tends to be read only in the context of liability in case of an accident and failure in outer space activities, and does not relate this with the concept of outer space as a common heritage of mankind that creates the obligation of sharing benefit. This paper argues that the orientation and form of the privatization of space law should be within the basic spirit of the utilization of outer space: for the common interest of all mankind.
机译:空间法不是“独立”的法律;其主要来源是国际法。这一重要后果之一是使主要演员在利用外层空间。从五个空间条约可以看出,空间法的原始特征是专门治理外层空间的国家活动的公法。然而,在过去二十年中,在过去二十年中发生了密集的外层空间的私有化和商业化也得到了私有化空间法 - 指导空间法对私人和商业问题更加敏感。空间条约第十条允许非政府实体从事外层空间活动。这意味着外层空间活动的私有化和商业化是合法可接受的。但是,本文并未对哪些可以商业化的外层空间活动的任何限制以及哪些不是?如果文章将被读到所有外层空间活动可以商业化,主要问题是,无论是与外层空间利用的基本精神相反:为所有人类的共同兴趣吗?此外,在外层空间活动发生事故和失败的情况下,本文倾向于在责任范围内只读,并没有将其与外层空间的概念相关联,作为创造分享义务的人类的常见遗产益处。本文认为,空间法私有化的方向和形式应在外层空间利用的基本精神内:为了所有人类的共同兴趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号