首页> 外文会议>Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium >Combining dynamic fault trees and event trees for probabilistic risk assessment
【24h】

Combining dynamic fault trees and event trees for probabilistic risk assessment

机译:组合动态故障树木和事件树木概率风险评估

获取原文

摘要

As system analysis methodologies, both event tree analysis (ETA) and fault tree analysis (FTA) are used in probabilistic risk assessment (PRA), especially in identifying system interrelationships due to shared events. Although there are differences between them, ETA and FTA, are so closely linked that fault trees (FT) are often used to quantify system events that are part of event tree (ET) sequences (J.D. Andrew et al., 2000). The logical processes employed to evaluate ET sequences and quantify the consequences are the same as those used in FTA. Although much work has been done to combine FT and ET, traditional methods only concentrate on combining static fault trees (SFT) and ET. Our main concern is considering how to combine dynamic fault trees (DFT) and ET. We proposed a reasonable approach in this paper, which is illustrated through a hypothetical example. Because of the complexity of dynamic systems, including the huge size and complicated dependencies, there may exist contradictions among different dynamic subsystems. The key benefit of our approach is that we avoid the generation of such contradictions in our model. Another benefit is that efficiency may be improved through modularization.
机译:随着系统分析方法,无论事件树分析(ETA)和故障树分析(FTA)在概率风险评估(PRA)被使用,特别是在识别系统的相互关系,由于共享的事件。虽然它们之间存在的差异,ETA和FTA,是如此紧密相连的是故障树(FT)经常被用来量化是事件树(ET)序列的一部分,系统事件(J.D. Andrew等,2000)。来评估ET序列和量化后果的逻辑过程是相同的那些FTA使用。虽然大量的工作已经完成,FT和ET相结合,传统方法只集中在动静结合的故障树(SFT)和ET。我们主要关注的是考虑如何动态故障树(DFT)和ET相结合。我们建议在本文中,这是通过一个假设的例子说明一个合理的方法。由于动力系统,其中包括规模庞大和复杂的依赖关系的复杂性,可能存在不同的动态子系统之间的矛盾。我们的方法的主要好处是,我们避免在我们的模型这种矛盾的产生。另一个好处是效率可以通过模块化的提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号