首页> 外文会议>Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium >Supporting Maintenance Decisions with Expert and Event Data
【24h】

Supporting Maintenance Decisions with Expert and Event Data

机译:支持与专家和事件数据的维护决策

获取原文

摘要

A successful maintenance program incorporates planning and follow-up processes, including systematic feedback and data collection systems and routines. In the process industry, maintenance data collection systems do not typically contain the methods and analysis tools needed to support the continuous update of the maintenance program. Implementation of the necessary procedures and tools can be successful only if the data collection and updating is simple and automated, and does not appreciably increase the workload of the people responsible for maintenance development. The aim of our study is to find methods for predicting the number of failures and the time to the next failure using expert data, which is updated with the collected event data. In this study, three methods for predicting the number of failures were compared. The event and expert data was collected from a Finnish board mill. Tested predicted methods included the moving average, and models for the Poisson process and power law process. With our data set, moving average delivered as good estimates as the more sophisticated ones. One of the four test cases showed especially large variations in the recorded yearly failure rate - and none of the testing predicting methods delivered reliable estimates in this case. Because maintenance actions are carried out also during other stoppages, the event data proved to be insufficient for time to failure predictions. The results proved that a continuously improving maintenance program should be based, not only on the event data, but also on all other relevant information. This means than data from different sources need to be combined and the quality of the recorded data must be high.
机译:成功的维护计划包含规划和后续进程,包括系统反馈和数据收集系统和程序。在流程行业中,维护数据收集系统通常不包含支持维护程序连续更新所需的方法和分析工具。只有当数据收集和更新简单和自动化时,才能实现必要的程序和工具,并且不会明显增加负责维护开发的人员的工作量。我们的研究目的是找到预测故障次数的方法以及使用专家数据的下一个故障的时间,该专家数据与收集的事件数据更新。在这项研究中,比较了三种预测失败次数的方法。活动和专家数据从芬兰董事会厂收集。测试的预测方法包括移动平均值,以及泊松过程和电力法律过程的模型。使用我们的数据集,移动平均值作为更复杂的估计值交付。四个测试用例之一显示出记录的年度故障率特别大的变化 - 并且在这种情况下没有测试预测方法提供可靠的估计。因为在其他停工期间也进行了维护行动,所以事件数据被证明不足以减少故障预测。结果证明,不仅需要完善的维护计划,不仅应基于事件数据,还应基于所有其他相关信息。这意味着需要组合不同源的数据,并且记录数据的质量必须高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号