首页> 外文会议>West Virginia Surface Mine Drainage Task Force Symposium >IMPACTS OF SURFACE MINING AND 'AOC' RECLAMATION ON SMALL STREAMS AND DRAINAGE NETWORKS
【24h】

IMPACTS OF SURFACE MINING AND 'AOC' RECLAMATION ON SMALL STREAMS AND DRAINAGE NETWORKS

机译:表面挖掘与“AOC”综合对小型流和排水网络的影响

获取原文

摘要

Many Appalachian drainage networks have been extensively altered by surface mining and reclamation. Mine sites reclaimed after passage of the Surface Mine Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) of 1977, must meet SMCRA Approximate Original Contour (AOC) requirements. However, investigations at three north-central West Virginia study show AOC is far removed from original landscape form and function. Specific drainage transformation varies greatly with reclamation style. Small stream drainage density decreased in all cases, but declines were less where sediment trenches act as low-gradient streams. Many reclaimed slopes lack small streams, relying on groundwater and overland flow to deliver water to larger streams. Thus, many headwater streams in unmined uplands are severed from the rest of the drainage system. Slopes below truncated headwater streams are prone to instability. Groundwater and sheet flow lack capacity to handle moderate- to high-magnitude runoff from intense rainfall. Steep slopes commonly showed significant gully erosion very soon after reclamation and these gullies fore-tell long-lived channel paths across reclaimed slopes. Most constructed drainage was designed for extreme runoff, and lacks the "channel within a channel" cross-sections that promote stability during formative bankfull flows that occur every year or two. Constructed channels are poor matches to natural streams with respect to gradient, sinuosity and bed materials. Oversize channels may not fail during the reclamation bond period, but inevitably most will face sedimentation or lateral erosion problems. Existing reclamation practices inadequately address the important roles of small streams in storm-water conveyance and sediment transport, and virtually eliminate ecological functions critical to the biological viability of all streams throughout a watershed. Long-term stability of reclaimed slopes and ecological sustainability of streams will require designs that accommodate both moderate bankfull flows and large infrequent floods.
机译:许多Appalachian排水网络已被表面挖掘和填海群广泛改变。在1977年的地表矿井控制和回收法(SMCRA)通过后回收的矿山,必须满足SMCRA近似原始轮廓(AOC)要求。然而,三个中西部弗吉尼亚州三个中央弗吉尼亚州的调查显示AOC远离原始景观形式和功能。特定的排水转换与填海方式变化很大。在所有情况下,小型流引流密度下降,但沉积物沟充当低梯度流的情况下下降较少。许多再生斜坡缺乏小型溪流,依靠地下水和陆上流动将水输送到更大的溪流。因此,未在排列的上升的许多下部流料被从排水系统的其余部分切断。截断的沿散水流以下的斜率易于不稳定。地下水和薄片流量缺乏从强烈降雨中处理中度至高度径流的能力。陡峭的斜坡通常在回收后很快展现出显着的沟壑侵蚀,并且这些牙龈前面讲述了在再生斜坡上的长寿渠道路径。大多数构造的排水器设计用于极端径流,并且缺乏通道中的“通道”横截面,这些横截面促进了每年或两者的形成性银行流动期间的稳定性。构造的通道与梯度,污物和床材料相对于天然流差。在填海键期间,超大频道可能不会失败,但不可避免地是面临沉降或横向侵蚀问题。现有的回收实践不充分地解决了雨水输送和沉积物运输中小型流的重要作用,几乎消除了在流域整个流域的所有溪流的生物生物活力至关重要的生态功能。再生倾斜的长期稳定性和流的生态可持续性将需要设计,以适应适度的银行流量和大量不常洪水。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号