首页> 外文会议>IASTED International Multi-conference on Applied Informatics >Comparing CBR and NN Performance in a 3D Face Recognition Application
【24h】

Comparing CBR and NN Performance in a 3D Face Recognition Application

机译:比较3D面部识别应用中的CBR和NN性能

获取原文

摘要

The 3D face verification is a common task for humans, however for computers this is harder and slower. This paper shows results of two important paradigms in Artificial Intelligence -AI, Artificial Neural Networks -ANN and Case Based Reasoning -CBR, applied to 3D facial pattern classification. To test both approaches, 52 different individuals with their own variations in different spatial positions and expressions compound the 3D face database. In the Case Based Reasoning approach, the Hamming Distance evaluate the degree of similitude between cases. To improve the results a spatial normalization and a facial weight criterion are applied. In the Neural Networks approach by Radial Basis Function, the property of interpolation between faces and their variation, and the diversity of faces help to minimize the output error. The obtained results show that ANN's paradigm classifies better the faces patterns than the CBR paradigm, reaching zero False Acceptance Ratio -FAR and False Rejection Rate -FRR errors for the 3D face set used.
机译:3D面部验证是人类的共同任务,但对于计算机而言,这更难以慢。本文显示了人工智能 - 中的两个重要范例,人工神经网络-ann和基于案例的推理-CBR,适用于3D面部图案分类。为了测试两种方法,在不同的空间位置和表达式中有52个不同的个体,以及表达式3D面部数据库。在基于案例的推理方法中,汉明距离评估病例之间的类似程度。为了改善结果,应用空间归一化和面部重量标准。在神经网络通过径向基函数方法中,面部之间的插值属性及其变化,以及面的多样性有助于最小化输出误差。所获得的结果表明,ANN的范例比CBR范例更好地分类面部图案,达到了零假验收比率-FAR和使用的假拒绝率-FRR错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号