首页> 外文会议>International Modal Analysis Conference >DAMAGE DETECTION OF SUSPENSION BRIDGES
【24h】

DAMAGE DETECTION OF SUSPENSION BRIDGES

机译:悬架桥梁的损坏检测

获取原文

摘要

The paper discusses damage detection of suspension bridges. The detection is based on comparison of initial signature (FRF, mode shapes and so on) of intact bridges with that of damaged bridges. Three waveform recognition indices based on FRF, i.e., the waveform chain code (WCC), the adaptive template methods (ATM) and the signature assurance criterion (SAC), and three mode shape-based methods, i.e., the coordinate modal assurance criterion (COMAC), the flexibility and the curvature mode shapes are used for damage detection of suspension bridges. Their sensibility to damage in deck of Tsing Ma suspension bridge is compared. This paper also discusses the application of the strain mode shape method to damage detection. The results show that among the 3 waveform recognition indices, ATM and WCC are more sensitive to damage than SAC. All of them, however, can not predict damage locations. The results also show that among the 3 mode shape-based methods, the flexibility and the curvature mode shape method are more sensitive to damage than COMAC, and can predict damage locations. It is demonstrated by experiment and analysis on uniform cantilever beams that strain modal shape methods are better for damage detection in some aspects.
机译:本文讨论了悬架桥梁的损坏检测。该检测基于具有损坏桥梁的完整桥梁的初始签名(FRF,模式形状等)的比较。基于FRF的三个波形识别指标,即波形链码(WCC),自适应模板方法(ATM)和签名保证标准(SAC)和三种模式形状的方法,即坐标模态保证标准( COMAC),灵活性和曲率模式形状用于悬架桥的损坏检测。比较了它们对青马悬架桥甲板损坏的敏感性。本文还讨论了应变模式形状法在损伤检测中的应用。结果表明,在3个波形识别指标中,ATM和WCC对损坏比囊更敏感。但是,所有这些都无法预测损坏位置。结果还表明,在基于3模式的方法中,灵活性和曲率模式形状方法比COMAC更敏感,并且可以预测损坏位置。通过对均匀悬臂梁的实验和分析来证明,在某些方面,应变模态形状方法更好地损坏损伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号