首页> 外文会议>International Plant Protection Congress >Good Agricultural Practice (GAP) and Integrated Plant Protection (IPP) - two instruments with the same tenor?
【24h】

Good Agricultural Practice (GAP) and Integrated Plant Protection (IPP) - two instruments with the same tenor?

机译:良好的农业实践(差距)和综合植物保护(IPP) - 两种具有同一个男高音的仪器?

获取原文

摘要

Good Agricultural Practice (GAP) focuses on practical instructions for plant protection. GAP lays down orientation standards and forms the links between legal rales and authorized plant protection products. Integrated Plant Protection (IPP) goes further than GAP; it is both a model and a complex concept that seeks to balance economic and ecological demands. The reasons behind the development of GAP were the environmental damage caused by chemical plant protection products and the public discussions of their consequences. In Germany the official plant protection service and the crop-specific associations have together designed the rules for GAP. The Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection published basic principles for carryingout GAP in plant protection on 9 February 2005 (Anon, 2005). In addition the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation (EPPO) has published general and crop-specific principles referring to cultivation (EPPO, 2003); e.g. Good Practice in Potato Production (EPPO, 2001).
机译:良好的农业实践(GAP)侧重于植物保护的实用指示。差距奠定了取向标准,并形成了合法兰肯和授权植物保护产品之间的联系。综合植物保护(IPP)进一步而不是间隙;它既是一个模型和复杂的概念,寻求平衡经济和生态需求。差距发展背后的原因是化工厂保护产品造成的环境损害以及对其后果的公开讨论。在德国,官方工厂保护服务和作物特定的协会在一起设计了差距规则。联邦粮食,农业和消费者保护部于2005年2月9日公布了植物保护差距的基本原则(Anon,2005)。此外,欧洲和地中海植物保护组织(EPPO)发表了培养的一般和作物特定原则(EPPO,2003);例如土豆生产良好做法(EPPO,2001)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号