首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Water-Rock Interaction >Comparison of different approaches for bioleaching of a granite-type uranium ore
【24h】

Comparison of different approaches for bioleaching of a granite-type uranium ore

机译:花岗岩型铀矿石生物浸出不同方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Uranium bioleaching has been rapidly developed in China during recent years. However, some problems during bioleaching, such as low uranium leaching efficiency for rocks lacking pyrite, remain to be solved. A granite type uranium deposit from southern China was selected for the study of U bioleaching with addition of pyrite. Experiments using four approaches, including (i) pyrite ores mixing with culture, (ii) pyrite tiled on the surface of ores with culture, (iii) no pyrite ores with culture, and (iv) pyrite ores without culture were examined in this study. Results showed that bacteria can improve U leaching efficiency, particularly by adding pyrite into ore. Approach (i) pyrite ores mixing with culture had the highest U concentration and the highest recovery rate of the four approaches. No significant difference was observed between approaches (ii) pyrite tiled on the surface of ores with culture and (iii) no pyrite ores with culture.
机译:近年来中国在中国迅速发展了铀生物浸润。然而,在生物浸出过程中存在一些问题,例如缺乏硫铁矿的岩石的低铀浸出效率,仍有待解决。从加入黄铁矿的南方南部乌蒽矿床矿床进行选中。使用四种方法的实验,包括(i)与培养物混合的黄铁矿,(ii)在培养物表面上铺张的黄铁矿,(iii)在本研究中检测了(IV)矿物质,(IV)硫酸盐矿石,在本研究中检测。结果表明,细菌可以提高U浸出效率,特别是通过将硫铁矿加入矿石中。方法(i)与培养物混合的黄铁矿矿石的浓度最高,四种方法的恢复率最高。在用培养物的矿石表面和(III)的矿石表面上铺丝的方法(II)岩石之间没有显着差异,(III)没有培养物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号