首页> 外文会议>Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference >Learning Styles and Learning Strategies of Geology Technology and Exploration Information Technology Students in Petroleum and Natural Gas Higher Institute of Technology and Training in Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
【24h】

Learning Styles and Learning Strategies of Geology Technology and Exploration Information Technology Students in Petroleum and Natural Gas Higher Institute of Technology and Training in Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

机译:沙特阿拉伯王国石油及天然气地质技术与勘探信息技术学生地质技术与勘探信息技术学生的学习态度及学习策略

获取原文

摘要

The study is aimed to determine the relationship between the learning styles and strategies of 321 students in Petroleum and Natural Gas Higher Institute of Technology and Training in Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It sought to assess the extent of practice of the students' learning styles along Visual, Auditory and Tactile learning styles. Further, the level of students' preference in the following learning strategies: Memorization, Problem Solving, Experimentation, Group Study and Immersion was assessed by institute and year levels and to determine if there exists a relationship between the extent of practice of the above mentioned learning styles and the level of preferences of the learning strategies. The investigation made used the descriptive method. The stratified sampling is utilized the sample size of the study. Data gathered were tabulated and interpreted using statistical tools such as weighted mean to assess the various learning styles and on the level of students' preference on the different learning strategies, correlation analysis for the significant relationship and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the identifying the significant differences in learning styles and learning strategies according to levels. It is revealed that the results showed a homogeneous type of students in spite of differences in institutes where they belong. For each of the learning styles, students practice much of them. Learning styles are not determined by inherited characteristics, but develop through experience. By comparing the computed weighted means, it could be observed that Tactile is consistently in number one slot having weighted means of 3.85 for Level 1, 3.80 for Level 2 and 3.78 for Level 3 while Visual followed at weighted means of 3.70, 3.65, and 3.59 as rated by Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3, respectively. Auditory learning style is also much practiced by the students in the three levels where Level 1 students rated this style a weighted mean of 3.66, Level 2 students rated this style also with a weighted mean of 3.64 and for Level 3, a weighted mean of 3.48. Level 1 to Level 3 highly preferred experimentation, problem solving, immersion and group study are highly preferred while the memorization is moderately preferred. This corroborated with the conclusion that students in order to have a better grasp on the topics or lesson, involving other senses not just the eyes (normally utilized in memorization).
机译:该研究旨在确定沙特阿拉伯王国石油和天然气高级技术高级工程技术研究所的321名学生的学习风格和策略关系。它试图评估学生沿着视觉,听觉和触觉学习方式的学习方式的实践程度。此外,在以下学习策略中的学生偏好程度:由研究所和年级评估记忆,问题解决,实验,群体研究和浸渍,并确定上述学习的实践程度之间存在关系样式和学习策略的偏好程度。调查使得描述方法使用。分层采样使用研究的样本量。收集的数据是使用统计工具的制表和解释,例如加权均值,以评估各种学习方式以及学生偏好对不同学习策略的偏好,相关性分析和对识别的差异分析(ANOVA)的相关性分析根据水平的学习风格和学习策略的显着差异。据透露,结果表明,尽管他们所属的机构差异,但结果表明了一个均匀的学生。对于每个学习方式,学生们练习了很多。学习方式不是通过继承的特征来确定的,但通过经验发展。通过比较计算的加权装置,可以观察到,触觉一致地,对于3级,3.80,3级,3.78,适用于3级,3.78,适用于3级,3.70,3.65和3.59分别为1级,2级和3级。听觉学习风格的三个级别的学生也练习了三级学生评级这款风格的加权平均值3.66,等级2学生的评级此风格也为3.64的加权平均值和3级,加权平均值为3.48 。在第3级高度优选的实验,问题解决,浸渍和组研究是非常优选的,同时中记忆化。这是为了获得学生在主题或课程上更好地掌握其他感官的结论,不仅仅是眼睛(通常用于记忆)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号