首页> 外文会议>Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference >Relative Permeability Measurements to Quantify the Low Salinity Flooding Effect at Field Scale
【24h】

Relative Permeability Measurements to Quantify the Low Salinity Flooding Effect at Field Scale

机译:相对渗透率测量,以定量现场规模的低盐度泛滥效应

获取原文

摘要

In the last few years it has become widely accepted in the industry that Low Salinity Flooding (LSF) works by changing reservoir wettability towards a more water-wet state. Most of the published experimental data to quantify the LSF effect focus on comparing ultimate recovery of low salinity (LS) and high salinity (HS) waterflooding experiments either in secondary and/or tertiary mode. A wide range in incremental oil recovery is reported in the literature, from 0 to more than 20% of OIIP. To assess the potential of LSF and to enable upscaling of the LSF benefit to reservoir scale, the relative permeability curves for HS and LS brine should be determined. In only a few published cases, the experimental data was interpreted using numerical simulations to derive relative permeability curves for both low and high salinity water. So far all of the LSF corefloods reported in the literature have been done using the unsteady state (USS) coreflooding method. Unsteady state corefloods are appropriate in evaluating the LSF potential qualitatively and to de-risk for potential formation damage due to clay swelling. However, USS corefloods can only measure the relative permeability curves after water breakthrough and they are sensitive to heterogeneities in the core samples. The steady state (SS) coreflood method, on the other hand, is less sensitive to sample heterogeneity and can measure the relative permeability curves over a wide saturation range. In this paper we will present the experimental procedures and data measured during SS LSF core floods using less homogeneous core samples from a sandstone reservoir. Details of the experimental procedures to quantify the LSF effect were published earlier (Masalmeh et al. 2014). In this study a combination of USS and SS coreflooding experiments using in-situ saturation monitoring were performed, accompanied by spontaneous imbibition tests. Numerical simulation of the experimental data was used to extract the LS and HS relative permeability curves. While the Amott and USS experiments unequivocally showed a very clear positive LSF effect with no formation damage, SS corefloods tests were performed to better quantify the effect. The result of the tests, - to our knowledge - are the first to be reported in the industry for LSF on real rock material, allow extracting reliable relative permeabilities and enable upscaling of the LSF effect to field scale.
机译:在过去的几年里,在产业中,通过改变水库润湿性朝着更加水湿的国家的水库润湿性,它已被广泛接受。大多数公开的实验数据量化LSF效应的重点是在次级和/或三级模式中比较低盐度(LS)和高盐度(HS)的最终回收率。在文献中报告了增量溢油恢复的广泛,从0到超过20%的OIIP。为了评估LSF的潜力并使LSF的UPALING升高到储层规模,应确定HS和LS盐水的相对渗透曲线。在只有少数公布的情况下,使用数值模拟来解释实验数据,以导出低盐度和高盐水的相对渗透性曲线。到目前为止,在文献中报告的所有LSF CoreFloods都使用了不稳定的状态(USS)CoreFlood方法进行了完成。不稳定状态CoreFloods适用于定性地评估LSF潜力,并且由于粘土肿胀而导致潜在的形成损伤的风险。然而,美国内胆普遍只能测量水突破后的相对渗透性曲线,并且它们对核心样品中的异质性敏感。另一方面,稳态(SS)CoreFlood方法对样品异质性敏感,并且可以在宽饱和范围内测量相对渗透率曲线。在本文中,我们将介绍在SS LSF核心泛洪期间测量的实验程序和数据,使用来自砂岩储层的均匀核心样本。用于量化LSF效应的实验程序的细节之前发布(Masalmeh等,2014)。在这项研究中,通过自发性吸收测试进行了使用原位饱和监测的USS和SS CorePood实验的组合。实验数据的数值模拟用于提取LS和HS相对磁导率曲线。虽然AMOTT和USS实验明确显示出非常明确的阳性LSF效应,但没有形成损伤,进行SS CoreFloods测试以更好地量化效果。测试结果 - 致以我们的知识 - 是第一个在实际岩石材料上为LSF的行业报告的第一个,允许提取可靠的相对渗透率,并使LSF效应的上升效应对现场规模。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号