首页> 外文会议>Conference on detection and remediation technologies for mines and minelike targets >Holographic Neural Networks versus Conventional Neural Networks: A Comparative Evaluation for the Classification of Landmine Targets in Ground Penetrating Radar Images
【24h】

Holographic Neural Networks versus Conventional Neural Networks: A Comparative Evaluation for the Classification of Landmine Targets in Ground Penetrating Radar Images

机译:全息神经网络与传统神经网络:地面雷达图像地雷靶靶分类的比较评价

获取原文

摘要

This paper evaluates the performance of a holographic neural network in comparison with a conventional feedforward backpropagation neural network for the classification of landmine targets in ground penetrating radar images. The data used in the study was acquired from four different test sites using the landmine detection system developed by General Dynamics Canada Ltd., in collaboration with the Defense Research and Development Canada, Suffield. A set of seven features extracted for each detected alarm is used as stimulus inputs for the networks. The recall responses of the networks are then evaluated against the ground truth to declare true or false detections. The area computed under the receiver operating characteristic curve is used for comparative purposes. With a large dataset comprising of data from multiple sites, both the holographic and conventional networks showed comparable trends in recall accuracies with area values of 0.88 and 0.87, respectively. By using independent validation datasets, the holographic network's generalization performance was observed to be better (mean area = 0.86) as compared to the conventional network (mean area = 0.82). Despite the widely publicized theoretical advantages of the holographic technology, use of more than the required number of cortical memory elements resulted in an over-fitting phenomenon of the holographic network.
机译:本文评估了全息性神经网络的性能与传统的馈电反向衰减神经网络相比,用于地面穿透雷达图像中的地雷靶标分类。该研究中使用的数据来自四种不同的测试站点,使用General Dynamics Ltd.开发的Landmine检测系统与加拿大国防研究和开发合作,罢工。针对每个检测到的警报提取的一组七个功能用作网络的刺激输入。然后,对网络的召回响应对基础事实进行评估以申报真假或错误的检测。在接收器操作特性曲线下计算的区域用于比较目的。对于包括来自多个站点的数据的大数据集,全息和传统网络均显示出召回精度的相当趋势,分别为0.88和0.87的面积值。通过使用独立的验证数据集,与传统网络相比,观察到全息网络的泛化性能更好(平均区域= 0.86)(平均区域= 0.82)。尽管全息技术的广泛宣传的理论优势,但使用多于所需的皮质内存元件数量导致全息网络的过度拟合现象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号