首页> 外文会议>International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems >Distractive or supportive - how warnings in the head-up display affect drivers' gaze and driving behavior
【24h】

Distractive or supportive - how warnings in the head-up display affect drivers' gaze and driving behavior

机译:分散体验或支持 - 如何在朝上显示屏上警告影响司机的凝视和驾驶行为

获取原文

摘要

Urban areas expose drivers to a lot of challenges (e.g., many kinds of distracting stimuli and road users) and critical situations, increasing the probability of driver errors. Therefore the accident rate in urban areas is quite high and driver assistance is needed. As part of the research project UR:BAN, this study investigates the effectiveness of four different types of driver warnings (+ control group), presented in a head-up display (HUD), to support drivers in a very critical urban scenario. The aim of these driver warnings was to alert drivers to a forthcoming pedestrian crossing the ego vehicle's road, eliciting a fast and strong response from the drivers like an emergency brake. The driver warnings varied in their strategy (attention vs. reaction oriented) and specificity (generic vs. specific). In a driving simulation the drivers' gaze and driving behavior were analyzed. A total of sixty drivers were tested in a between-subjects design (27 female, 33 male; M= 23.7 years, SD= 3.7 years). In general, all driver warnings affected the drivers' performance positively. Even though the number of collisions was not reduced, drivers showed a faster and stronger brake reaction when being warned, which nevertheless reduced the collision severity. While all drivers gazed at the safety-critical object, only about half of the drivers showed a HUD glance. When the drivers gazed at the HUD, the positive effect of the driver warnings on the brake reaction time was reduced. Thus, driver warnings which do not have to be fixated in order to be perceived are an interesting perspective for future research. Furthermore, the warning types differed little from each other in their effects on the drivers' performance. However, one warning, which was somewhat more unusual and difficult to understand, was least effective. This shows that a bad design of a warning can negate the potential benefits. Overall, the examined driver warnings can be recommended for very critical situations as they improved the drivers' performance and did not distract them. However, not all driver warnings are equally well suited.
机译:城市地区将司机暴露于大量挑战(例如,多种分散注意力和道路用户)和危急情况,增加了驾驶员错误的可能性。因此,城市地区的事故率是相当高的,需要驾驶员援助。作为研究项目的一部分UR:禁令,本研究调查了四种不同类型的驾驶员警告(+对照组)的有效性,以便在抬头显示(HUD)中,以支持一个非常关键的城市情景中的驱动程序。这些司机警告的目的是提醒司机到即将举办的行人穿过自我车辆的道路,诱因像紧急制动器这样的司机的快速和强烈的反应。司机警告在其策略中变化(注意力与反应导向)和特异性(通用与特定)。在驾驶模拟中,分析了驾驶员的凝视和驾驶行为。在科学间设计(27名女性,33名男性; M = 23.7岁,SD = 3.7岁)中,共有六十名司机进行了测试。一般而言,所有司机警告都会积极影响司机的性能。即使碰撞的数量没有减少,司机在警告时表现出更快,更强的制动反应,这然而降低了碰撞严重程度。虽然所有司机凝视着安全关键的对象,但只有大约一半的司机展示了一个HUD浏览。当驾驶员凝视到HUD时,减少了驾驶员警告对制动反应时间的积极效果。因此,不必要被定义的司机警告是为了被认为是一个有趣的观点,以便将来的研究。此外,警告类型在它们对驱动程序性能的影响中彼此不同。然而,一个警告,这有点不寻常,难以理解,最不效力。这表明警告的错误设计可以否定潜在的好处。总的来说,由于它们提高了司机的性能,因此可以推荐检查的司机警告,以便非常关键的情况,并没有分散他们的注意力。但是,并非所有驱动程序警告都同样适应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号