【24h】

POLICY DIFFUSION IN COMMUNITY-SCALE FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT

机译:社区规模洪水风险管理中的政策扩散

获取原文

摘要

This study analyzes which communities adopted flood risk management practices during the past 25 years. In particular, we focus on community-scale flood management efforts undertaken voluntarily in towns and counties across the United States. In 1990, the US Federal Emergency Management Agency created the Community Rating System (CRS) to provide incentives to local governments to improve flood resilience. About 1,300 counties and cities voluntarily participate in the CRS, but most eligible communities do not participate. Here, we explore the factors shaping community CRS participation, such as flood risk, socio-economic characteristics, and economic resources, and we assess the competing phenomena of policy diffusion versus free riding. Previous models of community-scale flood mitigation activities have all considered each community's decision as independent of one another. Yet one community's flood management activities might directly or indirectly influence its neighbors' mitigation efforts. Spillover effects or "contagion" may arise if neighboring communities learn from or seek to emulate or outcompete early adopting neighbors. Conversely, stricter regulation in one community may allow its neighbors to capitalize on looser regulation either by attracting more development or enjoying reduced "downstream" flood risks. This paper presents a conceptual model that allows for multiple forces affecting diffusion, such as copycatting and learning from neighboring communities, free-riding on neighbors' efforts, and competing with neighbors to provide valuable amenities. We empirically test for these alternative diffusion pathways after controlling for the spatially correlated extant flood risks, building patterns, and demographics. The analysis integrates several large datasets to predict community flood risk management for all cities and counties in the US since 1990. Controls for local flood risk combined with a spatial lag regression model allow separate identification of alternative diffusion pathways. The results indicate strong evidence of copycatting and also suggest possible free-riding.
机译:本研究分析了在过去的25年中通过了哪些社区通过了洪水风险管理实践。特别是,我们专注于社区规模的洪水管理努力,在美国城镇和县自动开展。 1990年,美国联邦应急管理机构创造了社区评级系统(CRS),为地方政府提供激励措施,以改善洪水抵御能力。大约1,300个县和城市自愿参加CRS,但最符合条件的社区没有参加。在这里,我们探讨了塑造社区CRS参与的因素,如洪水风险,社会经济特征和经济资源,我们评估了政策扩散与自由骑行的竞争现象。以前的社区规模洪水缓解活动的模型已经考虑了每个社区的决定彼此独立。然而,一个社区的洪水管理活动可能直接或间接地影响其邻国的缓解努力。如果邻近的社区学习或寻求模仿或超越采用邻居,可能会出现溢出效应或“传染”。相反,一个社区的更严格的规定可能允许其邻国通过吸引更多的开发或享受减少“下游”洪水风险来利用宽松的监管。本文提出了一种概念模型,允许多种力量影响扩散的力量,例如从邻近社区的汇编和学习,以邻居的努力脱颖而出,并与邻居竞争以提供有价值的设施。我们在控制空间相关的现存洪水风险,建筑模式和人口统计后经验测试了这些替代扩散途径。分析与自1990年以来,将几个大型数据集集成在一起,以预测美国所有城市和县的社区洪水风险管理。当地洪水风险与空间滞后回归模型的控制允许单独识别替代扩散途径。结果表明了复制证据的强有力证据,也表明可能的搭便车。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号