首页> 外文会议>International Workshop on Wireless Information Systems >Wireless Security: WPA Vs WAPI, should we be worried?
【24h】

Wireless Security: WPA Vs WAPI, should we be worried?

机译:无线安全:WPA与WAPI,我们应该担心吗?

获取原文

摘要

The IEEE 802.11 standard includes an optional encryption capability, the Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) however, WEP is vulnerable to attack and can easily be broken, therefore WEP was recently temporarily supplemented with Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) which offers improvements over WEP while a newer, more secure protocol 802.11i is developed. However, China has now introduced a new security protocol called WLAN Authentication and Privacy Infrastructure (WAPI) which is not a part of the IEEE 802.11 standard and is not interoperable with 802.11 which means that there will be two incompatible wireless security standards which will be inconvenient and more expensive for users. More importantly, because China is a large developing market, WAPI is an attempt by China to exert itself internationally as a major player in technological innovation by creating their own standard, even though this has the possibility to cause immense economic harm to established networking companies and disruption in the worldwide technological infrastructure.
机译:IEEE 802.11标准包括可选的加密功能,有线等效的隐私(WEP)但是,WEP很容易攻击并且很容易被打破,因此WEP最近暂时补充了Wi-Fi保护的访问(WPA),可提供改进的Wep虽然开发了更新,更安全的协议802.11i。但是,中国现在推出了一种名为WLAN身份验证和隐私基础架构(WAPI)的新安全协议,这不是IEEE 802.11标准的一部分,而不是802.11无法互操作,这意味着将有两个不可能的无线安全标准,这将是不方便的对用户来说更昂贵。更重要的是,由于中国是一个大型发展市场,WAPI是通过创造自己的标准作为技术创新的主要参与者,即使这有可能导致建立巨大的经济损害和建立的网络公司的可能性在全球技术基础设施中断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号