首页> 外文会议>Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council >COMPARING THE USE OF SYSTEMIC ANTIBIOTICS WITH INTRAMAMMARY ANTIBIOTICS IN DRY Cow THERAPY
【24h】

COMPARING THE USE OF SYSTEMIC ANTIBIOTICS WITH INTRAMAMMARY ANTIBIOTICS IN DRY Cow THERAPY

机译:与胎粪疗法中胎粪抗生素的使用进行比较使用系统抗生素

获取原文

摘要

The non-lactating (dry) period is well known as an important time for both the acquisition and treatment of intramammary infections. Although systemic use of antibiotic has been used in conjunction with intramammary therapy in lactating cattle, intramammary therapy alone has been routinely used for dry cow therapy (1). Previous research (2,3) has suggested that systemic therapy may be beneficial but most producers rely solely on intramammary dry cow therapy (DCT). It has been suggested that systemicantibiotics possess pharmacokinetics that enable better penetration into the udder tissue and improves the success of DCT. This study was designed to compare the use of an intramammary antibiotic alone or in conjunction with either systemic tylosin (Tylan, Blanco Animal Health) or oxytetracycline ( LA 200, Pfizer, Inc).
机译:非乳酸(干燥)期是众所周知的,是患内型感染的收购和治疗的重要时间。虽然系统性使用抗生素已经与哺乳动牛内的脑内治疗一起使用,但仅用于干牛治疗(1)的单独胎儿治疗。以前的研究(2,3)表明,全身治疗可能是有益的,但大多数生产者依赖于患胎粪干牛治疗(DCT)。已经提出,Systemicantibiotics具有药代动力学,可以更好地渗透到乳腺组织中并提高DCT的成功。本研究旨在将单人抗生素单独使用或与全身替代素(Tylan,Blanco Animal Health)或氧气(La 200,Pfizer,Inc)一起进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号