首页> 外文会议>Annual Rocky Mountain Bioengineering Symposium >RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SPECTRAL MEASURES OF BAROREFLEX SENSITIVITY AND INDICES OF CARDIAC VAGAL CONTROL
【24h】

RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SPECTRAL MEASURES OF BAROREFLEX SENSITIVITY AND INDICES OF CARDIAC VAGAL CONTROL

机译:沼泽镜敏感度和心脏迷离控制指标的谱测量的关系

获取原文

摘要

Traditionally baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) has been assessed with pharmacological approaches such as phenylephrine infusion. Recently, non-invasive approaches using spectral analytic techniques have been employed to combine heart rate and blood pressure variability parameters to estimate BRS (the alpha index). Some authors have argued that BRS assessed at different frequencies of cardiovascular variabilities provide identical information and they should be combined into a single index of BRS based on total variability. The present study examined the relationship between BRS assessed using low, high, and total heart rate and blood pressure variabilities, and indices of cardiac vagal control assessed by standard spectral measures. Participants were 105 older male and female African-Americans who were part of the Healthy Aging In Nationally Diverse Longitudinal Samples (HANDLS) Study. Heart rate and blood pressure variabilities (HRV and BPV) were assessed using the Fast-Fourier Transform (FFT). The alpha index was computed as the square root of the ratio of low, high, or the mean of low and high frequency heart rate variability and the corresponding frequency ranges for systolic blood pressure variability. Correlations examining the relationships among BRS and various (e.g. log, normalized) indices of high frequency heart period variability (HF) were calculated for the total sample and by gender. Results indicated that the different BRS indices do not have the same relationship to all indices of HF. The results suggest that an aggregation of the power across bands is problematic at best, and indicates the need to examine the various frequency components separately.
机译:传统上,通过诸如苯妥肾上的药理方法评估了Baroreflex敏感性(BRS)。最近,使用使用光谱分析技术的非侵入性方法将心率和血压变化参数组合以估计BRS(α指数)。一些作者认为,在不同频率的心血管变量中评估的BRS提供相同的信息,并且应基于总可变性组合成BRS的单一指标。本研究检测了使用低,高,全心率和血压变性评估的BRS之间的关系,以及通过标准光谱措施评估的心脏迷离控制索引。参与者是105名年龄较大的男性和女性非裔美国人,他们是全国各种纵向样本(HANDLS)研究中健康老龄化的一部分。使用快速傅里叶变换(FFT)评估心率和血压变性(HRV和BPV)。将α索引计算为低,高,高频心率变异性和高频心率变异性和相应的频率范围的平方根,以及用于收缩压变异性的相应频率范围。针对总样品和性别计算,对高频心脏周期变异性(HF)的各种(例如日志,标准化)指标进行检查的相关性。结果表明,不同的BRS指数与所有HF的所有索引没有相同的关系。结果表明,跨带的电力的聚合充其量是有问题的,并且表示需要单独检查各种频率分量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号