首页> 外文会议>Conference on signal processing, sensor fusion, and target recognition >Data Fusion: A Conceptual Approach to Level 2 Fusion (Situational Assessment)
【24h】

Data Fusion: A Conceptual Approach to Level 2 Fusion (Situational Assessment)

机译:数据融合:2级融合的概念方法(情境评估)

获取原文

摘要

Level 2 fusion is defined as situation awareness. Unfortunately, that is the point where the agreement on Level 2 fusion ends. The distinctions between the boundaries between Levels 1, 2, and 3 are not clearly defined. As a result, these disputes tend to cloud the discussion on the required functionality required of a Level 2 tracking system. Our approach to develop a system that solves a perceived Level 2 problem has three basic tenets: define the problem, develop the concept of the fusion architecture, and define the object state. These tenets provide the foundation to outline and explain the conceptual approach to a Level 2 problem. Each step from the problem fundamentals to the state definition used in the formulation of algorithmic approaches are presented. The discussion begins with a summary of the military problem, which can be considered situation assessment, of multiple levels of unit aggregation to determine force composition, current capabilities, and posture. The problem consists of fusion Level 1 information, incorporating doctrine and other knowledge base information to form a coherent scene of what exists in the field that can then be used as a component of intent analysis. The development of the problem model leads to the development of a Fusion architecture approach. The approach mirrors one of the standard approaches of Level 1 fusion: detection, prediction, association, hypothesis generation and management, and update. Unlike the Level 1 problem, these implementation steps will not become a rehash of the Kalman filter or similar approaches. Instead, the architecture permits a composite set of approaches including symbolic methodologies. The problem definition and the architecture lead to the development of the system state which represents the internal composition of the units and their aggregates. From this point, the discussion concludes with a short summary of potential algorithms proposed for implementation.
机译:2级融合被定义为情况意识。不幸的是,这就是2级融合协议结束的地步。级别1,2和3之间的边界之间的区别不明确定义。因此,这些纠纷倾向于云讨论级别2跟踪系统所需的所需功能。我们的方法开发一个解决方法的系统,解决了2级问题有三个基本原则:定义问题,开发融合体系结构的概念,并定义对象状态。这些原则为概要提供了基础,并解释了2级问题的概念方法。介绍了从问题基础上的每个步骤都介绍了用于制定算法方法的状态定义。讨论始于军事问题的概要,这可以被视为情况评估,多个单位聚集级别,以确定力量组成,当前能力和姿势。问题由融合级别1信息组成,包括学说和其他知识库信息,以形成现有字段中存在的相干场景,然后可以用作意图分析的组件。问题模型的发展导致融合架构方法的发展。该方法反映了1级融合的标准方法之一:检测,预测,关联,假设生成和管理以及更新。与1级问题不同,这些实施步骤不会成为卡尔曼滤波器或类似方法的再振动。相反,该体系结构允许包括符号方法的综合方法集。问题定义和架构导致系统状态的开发,该系统状态表示单位的内部组成及其聚集体。从这一点来看,讨论得出结论,提出了一个潜在算法的简短摘要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号