首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Multiphase >Comparison of steady state results from five different thermohydraulic simulators using strictly identical input data
【24h】

Comparison of steady state results from five different thermohydraulic simulators using strictly identical input data

机译:使用严格相同的输入数据的五种不同热液模拟器的稳态结果比较

获取原文

摘要

Numerous thermohydraulic simulators are available on the market for steady state calculations. Even though several of them have been validated against experimental as well as field data, they often seem to give different results when modelling identical systems. The problem is thereafter to define which results are most reliable? The use of different steady state flow correlations and different ways to present fluid PVT data tend to make such comparisons even more complicated. Based on these realities, a steady state comparison programme was launched to answer the question: "Will all results be equal if every simulator was exposed to identical input data in every sense of the word?" A hypothetical subsea production system was developed to define a very challenging transport system giving no room for tuning. The system was described in every detail in a rigorous design basis, including specifications of steady state correlation and fluid data. Four commercial suppliers of multiphase flow simulators were asked to perform thermohydraulic calculations of this system. In addition, Hydro decided to perform the same calculations with our in-house process simulator. The comparison programme proved to be a powerful tool to identify software bugs included within the software, since it was possible to give very detailed feedback to every supplier.
机译:市场上有许多热液模拟器可用于稳态计算。尽管它们中的一些已经针对实验和现场数据验证,但它们似乎在建模相同的系统时似乎会产生不同的结果。此后,问题是为了定义哪些结果是最可靠的?使用不同的稳态流相关和不同方式来呈现流体PVT数据倾向于使得这种比较更加复杂。基于这些现实,启动了稳态比较计划以回答问题:“如果每个模拟器都暴露在每一个字的每个意义上都是相同的输入数据,所有结果都会相等?”开发了一个假设的海底生产系统,以定义一个非常具有挑战性的运输系统,不提供调整的空间。以严格的设计为基础以每个细节描述系统,包括稳态相关性和流体数据的规范。要求四个多相流动模拟器的商业供应商进行该系统的热液计算。此外,Hydro决定与我们内部流程模拟器进行相同的计算。比较计划被证明是一个强大的工具,可以识别软件内包含的软件错误,因为有可能向每个供应商提供非常详细的反馈。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号