首页> 外文会议>World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics >HAS THE CHINESE ROOM ARGUMENT SHOWN 'STRONG ARTIFICIAL LIFE' TO BE IMPOSSIBLE?
【24h】

HAS THE CHINESE ROOM ARGUMENT SHOWN 'STRONG ARTIFICIAL LIFE' TO BE IMPOSSIBLE?

机译:中国的房间论点是否表现出“强烈的人工生命”是不可能的?

获取原文

摘要

We use the term 'Strong Artificial Life' to refer to the thesis that a sufficiently sophisticated computer simulation of a life-form is a life-form in its own right. Can John Searle's Chinese room Argument-originally intended by Searle to show that the thesis he dubs 'Strong AI' is false-be deployed against Strong A-Life? We have often encountered the suggestion that it can be (even in print; see Hamad 1993), However, so far as we know, there has been no detailed effort to state and assess a form of the argument which deals specifically with A-Life. We do our best to transfer the argument from the domain of AI to that of A-Life. We do so in order to show once and for all that the Chinese room argument proves nothing about A-Life.
机译:我们使用“强大的人工生命”一词来参考本文,即生命形式的足够复杂的计算机模拟是自身的寿命形式。 John Searle的中国房间论述 - 最初是由Searle的意图,表明他在强烈的A-Life举行了虚假的武装的论点?我们经常遇到这一建议,即它可以是(即使是印刷;看见Hamad 1993),但是,据我们所知,没有详细努力陈述和评估具体与生活的论据的形式。我们尽最大努力将参数从AI领域转移到生活中的论点。我们这样做是为了展示一次,为所有中国人的论证都证明了一个生活。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号