首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Artificial Immune Systems >Credit Card Fraud Detection with Artificial Immune System
【24h】

Credit Card Fraud Detection with Artificial Immune System

机译:信用卡欺诈检测与人工免疫系统

获取原文

摘要

We apply Artificial Immune Systems(AIS) [4] for credit card fraud detection and we compare it to other methods such as Neural Nets(NN) [8] and Bayesian Nets(BN) [2], Naive Bayes(NB) and Decision Trees(DT) [13]. Exhaustive search and Genetic Algorithm(GA) [7] are used to select optimized parameters sets, which minimizes the fraud cost for a credit card database provided by a Brazilian card issuer. The specifics of the fraud database are taken into account, such as skewness of data and different costs associated with false positives and negatives. Tests are done with holdout sample sets, and all executions are run using Weka [18], a publicly available software. Our results are consistent with the early result of Maes in [12] which concludes that BN is better than NN, and this occurred in all our evaluated tests. Although NN is widely used in the market today, the evaluated implementation of NN is among the worse methods for our database. In spite of a poor behavior if used with the default parameters set, AIS has the best performance when parameters optimized by GA are used.
机译:我们应用人工免疫系统(AIS)[4]用于信用卡欺诈检测,并将其与其他方法进行比较,如神经网(NN)[8]和贝叶斯网(BN)[2],幼稚贝叶斯(NB)和决定树木(dt)[13]。穷举搜索和遗传算法(GA)[7]用于选择优化的参数集,这最大限度地减少了巴西卡发卡机构提供的信用卡数据库的欺诈成本。欺诈数据库的具体细节被考虑在内,例如数据的歪曲和与误报和否定的不同成本。测试完成为HoldOut示例集,并且使用Weka [18],公开可用的软件运行所有执行。我们的结果与[12]中的MAES的早期结果一致,这结论是BN优于NN,这发生在所有评估的测试中。虽然NN广泛应用于当今市场,但NN的评估实现是我们数据库的更糟糕的方法。尽管采用默认参数集使用了较差的行为,但使用GA优化的参数时,AIS具有最佳性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号