首页> 外文会议>Asia-Pacific Bioinformatics Conference >Power estimation and sample size determination for replication studies genome-wide association studies
【24h】

Power estimation and sample size determination for replication studies genome-wide association studies

机译:复制研究基因组关联研究的功率估计和样本尺寸测定

获取原文

摘要

Background: Replication study is a commonly used verification method to filter out false positives in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). If an association can be confirmed in a replication study, it will have a high confidence to be true positive. To design a replication study, traditional approaches calculate power by treating replication study as another independent primary study. These approaches do not use the information given by primary study. Besides, they need to specify a minimum detectable effect size, which may be subjective. One may think to replace the minimum effect size with the observed effect sizes in the power calculation. However, this approach will make the designed replication study underpowered since we are only interestedin the positive associations from the primary study and the problem of the "winner's curse" will occur.Results: An Empirical Bayes (EB) based method is proposed to estimate the power of replication study for each association. The corresponding credible interval is estimated in the proposed approach. Simulation experiments show that our method is better than other plug-in based estimators in terms of overcoming the winner's curse and providing higher estimation accuracy. The coverage probability of given credible interval is well-calibrated in the simulation experiments. Weighted average method is used toestimate the average power of all underlying true associations. This is used to determine the sample size of replication study. Sample sizes are estimated on 6 diseases from Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) using our method. They are higher than sample sizes estimated by plugging observed effect sizes in power calculation.Conclusions: Our new method can objectively determine replication study's sample size by using information extracted from primary study. Also the winner's curse is alleviated. Thus, it is a better choice when designing replication studies of GWAS. The R-package is available at: http://bioinformatics.ust.hk/RPower.html.
机译:背景:复制研究是一种常用的验证方法,用于在基因组 - 范围内研究(GWAS)中过滤出误报的方法。如果可以在复制研究中确认协会,则会有很大的信心是正确的。为了设计复制研究,传统方法通过将复制研究视为另一个独立的初级研究来计算能力。这些方法不使用初级研究给出的信息。此外,他们需要指定最小可检测的效果大小,这可能是主观的。人们可以认为在功率计算中使用观察到的效果大小取代最小效果大小。然而,这种方法将使设计的复制研究能够受到支持的推动,因为我们才能发生从初步研究的积极协会,并且会发生“获奖者的诅咒”问题。结果:提出了基于经验贝叶斯(EB)的方法来估计每个关联复制研究的力量。以拟议的方法估计相应的可靠间隔。仿真实验表明,在克服胜利者的诅咒和提供更高的估计准确性方面,我们的方法比其他插件基于其他插件的估算更好。给定可靠间隔的覆盖概率在模拟实验中校准。使用加权平均方法是对所有基础真正关联的平均力量进行使用。这用于确定复制研究的样本大小。使用我们的方法估计来自惠康信托案例控制联盟(WTCCC)的6个疾病估计了样本尺寸。它们高于通过电源计算中的堵塞观察到的效果大小估计的样本尺寸。链接:我们的新方法可以通过使用从初级研究中提取的信息来了解复制研究的样本大小。还可以减轻获奖者的诅咒。因此,在设计GWA的复制研究时,它是更好的选择。 R-Package可用于:http://bioinformatics.ust.hk/rpower.html。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号