【24h】

A FIX FOR THE USEPA's RMP~*COMP MODEL

机译:FireSPA的RMP〜* COMP模型

获取原文

摘要

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Risk Management Program and Plan (RMP) Rule was issued on June 20, 1996, which required the implementation of the Risk Management Program by June 21, 1999 for the existing facilities. Hazard assessment is one of the main components of the RMP, which includes an estimate of possible release quantities for worst-case and alternative release scenarios and estimation of toxic endpoint distances. This analysis is more commonly known as offsite consequence analysis (OCA). EPA developed the RMP OCA Guidance Document to assist the facilities subject to RMP rule in performing the offsite consequence analysis for the worst-case as well as the alternative release scenarios. This document also provides guidance in estimating the evaporation rates from liquid pools at various temperatures and the toxic endpoint distances for the accidental releases of toxic substances. Guidance for similar analysis for common water solutions of toxic substances is also provided in this OCA guidance document. The EPA has also developed the RMP~*Comp Electronic Tool for performing the offsite consequence analysis. This is a computerized tool and is supposed to reproduce the results obtained using the RMP OCA guidance document. However, a review of the results of offsite consequence analysis performed for the worst-case release scenarios for common water solutions released in diked areas indicated that the dike option does not work properly (over-predicts toxic endpoint distances) if the common water solution release temperature is higher than 77 deg F (25°C). A review of the maximum temperatures recorded during the last three years in the various cities in USA indicated that maximum temperatures were higher than 77 deg F in most of the cites. Thus, the RMP*Comp Electronic Tool cannot be used to estimate the toxic endpoint distances for worst-case release scenarios involving common water solutions in most parts of the country. A further review of the RMP~*Comp Electronic Tool outputs indicated that this problem can be fixed quickly. In addition to fixing the RMP~*Comp Electronic Tool, a hybrid approach can be followed for estimating the toxic endpoint distances for worst-case release scenarios for common water solutions. This hybrid approach for aqueous ammonia involves the following steps: (1) use the RMP~*Comp Electronic Tool for estimating the evaporation rates at 77 deg F with and without dike, (2) calculate the ratio of these two evaporation rates, (3) estimate the release rate at the temperature higher than 77 deg F, (4) correct this evaporation rate for the diked condition using the ratio estimated in step 2, and (5) estimate the toxic endpoint distance using the Table 10 in the OCA guidance document. The details of this approach are presented in the paper.
机译:美国环境保护局(EPA)风险管理计划和计划(RMP)规则于1996年6月20日发布,该规则在1999年6月21日为现有设施执行了风险管理计划。危险评估是RMP的主要组成部分之一,其包括对最坏情况和替代释放场景的可能释放量的估计和有毒终点距离的估计。该分析更常见于离事后果分析(OCA)。 EPA开发了RMP OCA指导文件,以协助该设施对RMP规则进行,以便为最坏情况和替代发布方案进行异地后果分析。本文档还提供了估算各种温度的液体池中蒸发速率的指导,以及有毒源点的有毒源极释放的有毒物质的距离。在该OCA指导文件中还提供了有毒物质常见水溶液的类似分析的指导。 EPA还开发了RMP〜* Comp电子工具,用于执行异地后果分析。这是一种计算机化工具,并且应该再现使用RMP OCA指导文档获得的结果。然而,对偶然区域释放的普通水溶液的最坏情况释放方案进行了离境后果分析结果的审查表明,如果常见的水溶液释放,堤防选择不正常工作(过度预测有毒终点距离)温度高于77°F(25°C)。在美国各城市过去三年中记录的最高温度的审查表明,大多数张力最高温度高于77°F。因此,RMP * COMP电子工具不能用于估计涉及该国大多数地区涉及常见水溶液的最坏情况释放方案的有毒终点距离。对RMP〜* COMP电子工具输出的进一步审查表明此问题可以快速修复。除了固定RMP〜* COMP电子工具外,可以遵循混合方法,以估计用于常见水溶液的最坏情况释放方案的有毒终点距离。这种含水氨水方法涉及以下步骤:(1)使用RMP〜* COMP电子工具,用于估计77°F的蒸发速率,并且没有堤,(2)计算这两个蒸发速率的比率(3 )估计高于77°F的温度下的释放速率,(4)使用步骤2中的比率校正偶像条件的这种蒸发速率,(5)使用表10在OCA指导中使用表10估计有毒终点距离文档。本文的细节介绍在论文中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号