首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Combustion >COMPARISON OF AUTOMATIC REDUCTION PROCEDURES FOR IGNITION CHEMISTRY
【24h】

COMPARISON OF AUTOMATIC REDUCTION PROCEDURES FOR IGNITION CHEMISTRY

机译:点火化学自动减少手术的比较

获取原文

摘要

In this paper, we present a comparison between the reduced mechanisms obtained through a computational singular perturbation method (CSP) and the reduced mechanisms obtained through a lifetime analysis based only on the diagonal elements of the Jacobian matrix and a species sensitivity. The two methods are used for the analysis of autoignition, which is an interesting test situation because of the sensitivity of ignition to the radical pool and the smaller range of timescales expected. It is found that the steady-state species selected by the two methods are in good agreement. The mechanisms are reduced to a 10-step mechanism when CSP is applied and an 11-step mechanism in the case of the simpler lifetime analysis. Both mechanisms are compared with the detailed mechanism and experimental data and are found to reproduce the physical and chemical parameters very well. This shows that for a large part of the timescale range, the system is close to linear. The comparison shows the advantage of the CSP method as being somewhat more accurate. However, the simpler lifetime analysis is of sufficient accuracy and of more convenience when applied to a system requiring a considerable reduction in computational time, as is the case when applying online reduction.
机译:在本文中,我们展示了通过计算奇异扰动方法(CSP)获得的减少机制和通过仅基于雅各的矩阵的对角线元件和物种灵敏度的寿命分析获得的减少机制。这两种方法用于分析自燃,这是一个有趣的测试情况,因为点火对激进池的敏感性以及预期的较小范围的时间尺寸。发现两种方法选择的稳态物种始终吻合。当应用CSP时,该机构减少到10步机构,并且在更简单的寿命分析的情况下的11步机制。将两种机制与详细机制和实验数据进行比较,发现非常好地再现物理和化学参数。这表明对于少量部分时间范围,系统靠近线性。比较显示了CSP方法的优点,如稍微更准确。然而,当应用于计算时间相当大降低的系统时,更简单的寿命分析具有足够的准确性并且更方便,就像在线减少时的情况一样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号