首页> 外文会议>Center for Chemical Process Safety International Conference and Workshop >Facilitated Self-Assessment ― An Approach to Measuring PSM Systems
【24h】

Facilitated Self-Assessment ― An Approach to Measuring PSM Systems

机译:促进自我评估 - 一种测量PSM系统的方法

获取原文

摘要

The FSA has been very successful in fulfilling its objectives. It has been a tool to bring increased emphasis and priority on elements of the program where minimum standards have not been met. By compiling and analyzing the results for each specific business, and also for North America, we have been able to identify common program weaknesses so that they can be addressed. Manufacturing management has been very satisfied with the program and has also resisted efforts to extend the time between assessments. They desire an annual scorecard for a site's process safety program. Individual site scores have continued to improve both in achieving minimum standards and in overall ratings. Sites have become very competitive particularly within their own business area. They want to achieve the highest rating. This has both positive and negative aspects, but it has helped to increase emphasis on process safety. Doing the FSA can be time consuming. At smaller sites it can usually be completed in about two days. Larger sites may take up to 5 days or require two facilitators. Since we are all faced with fewer resources, extending the interval between assessments has been recommended. As stated before, this has been resisted by manufacturing management. However, the assessment intervals have been extended from the initial annual schedule. As the process has become more ingrained in our process safety culture, the assessments have become more quality focused. In 2001 key areas were chosen for more in-depth review to ensure that not only was the required information or program in-place, but that the quality of those elements was appropriate. Also over time our approach to the minimum standards and best practices has become more systems specific as opposed to compliance specific. We still include the compliance points but we have added more systems requirements: the plan, do, check, act, cycle. The FSA has been a very successful tool for Rhodia to drive process safety management program improvements. We expect it to continue to be successful in the future and have looked at expanding its use to other HSE areas.
机译:FSA一直非常成功地履行其目标。它是一种提高重点和优先权对未满足最低标准的计划的重点和优先权。通过编制和分析每个特定业务的结果,以及为北美的结果,我们已经能够识别共同的程序弱点,以便他们可以解决。制造业管理层对该计划非常满意,并且还抵制了延长了评估之间的时间。他们希望为网站的流程安全计划进行年度记分卡。在实现最低标准和整体评级方面,个人站点分数继续改善。遗址特别竞争,特别是在自己的业务领域。他们希望达到最高评级。这具有正面和消极的方面,但它有助于增加重点是过程安全。做FSA可能是耗时的。在较小的场地,通常可以在大约两天内完成。较大的部位可能需要5天或需要两个辅导员。由于我们都面临着更少的资源,因此建议延长评估之间的间隔。如前所述,这已通过制造管理抵制。但是,评估间隔已从最初的年度计划中延长。随着该过程在我们的过程安全文化中变得更加根深蒂固,评估的重点变得更加质量。 2001年,选择了以更深入的审查选择关键区域,以确保不仅是所需的信息或计划,而且这些要素的质量是合适的。随着时间的推移,我们对最低标准和最佳实践的方法已成为更具特定于特定的系统。我们仍然包括合规点,但我们已添加更多系统要求:计划,执行,检查,行为,周期。 FSA一直是罗地亚推动过程安全管理计划改进的一个非常成功的工具。我们希望它继续在未来取得成功,并期待扩大其对其他HSE地区的用途。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号