首页> 外文会议>Australian Weeds Conferences >Depleting weed seed banks within non-crop phases for the benefit of subsequent crops
【24h】

Depleting weed seed banks within non-crop phases for the benefit of subsequent crops

机译:在非作物阶段内消耗杂草种子库,以便随后的作物

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In 2003 a rotation trial was established at Avondale research station Western Australia to evaluate the effectiveness of introducing various one and three year non-crop phases into the rotation to deplete the seed bank of herbicide-resistant, annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaudin) populations. Treatments included grazed, three year pasture phases of subclover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) cv. Dalkeith, biserrula (Biserrula pelecinus L.) cv. Casbah, and lucerne (Medicago saliva L.); and ungrazed, one year phases of green manured field peas (Pisum sativum L.) or canola (Brassica napus L.), and brown manured French serradella (Ornithopus sativus Brot.) cv. Cadiz. Key measurements included seed bank size and weed density in the non-crop phase and subsequent crops. Initially (2003) the site had over 1000 ryegrass plants m~(-2) and approximately 350 dormant ryegrass seeds in mid winter. As expected, weed seed-set control was highly effective in green and brown manured treatments; these interventions contained the ryegrass seed bank initially, but one year of seed-set control was inadequate to return to sequential cropping, for the ryegrass seed bank increased rapidly to more than 10,000 dormant seeds m~(-2)within two years. By contrast, grazed, three year pasture phases combined with non-selective seed-set control significantly depleted the annual ryegrass seed bank. Overall grazed subclover was the most effective treatment with the annual ryegrass seed bank falling below 40 seeds m~(-2) and legume content rising from below 20%, in the establishment year, to greater than 90% in the third year of the non-crop phase. Collectively the results suggest that introducing a non-crop phase can provide an opportunity to decimate weed seed banks and minimise thedetrimental impact of weeds on subsequent crops.
机译:2003年,在西澳大利亚Avondale研究站建立了旋转试验,以评估换取各种非作物阶段的效果,以耗尽除草剂的种子群,每年黑麦草(Lolium Rigidum Gaudin)群体。含有放牧的治疗,三年亚洲牧草阶段(三粒细胞果汁L.)CV。达克思,双塞拉(Biserrula Pelecinus L.)CV。 Casbah和Lucerne(Medicago Saliva L.);并未向期,一年的绿色粪便豌豆(Pisum sativum L.)或油菜(Brassica Napus L.)的阶段,以及褐色调味的法国塞拉多菌(Ornithopus sativus brot。)cv。卡迪斯。关键测量包括非作物阶段和随后的作物中的种子堤尺寸和杂草密度。最初(2003)该网站在冬季中有超过1000个黑醋鱼植物M〜(2)和大约350个休眠黑麦草种子。正如预期的那样,杂草种子集控制在绿色和棕色逼迫治疗中非常有效;这些干预措施最初含有黑麦草种子银行,但一年的种子集控制不充分,以恢复顺序种植,对于黑麦草种子库在两年内迅速增加到10,000多个休眠种子M〜(2)。相比之下,吃草,三年的牧草阶段与非选择性种子集合控制相结合,显着耗尽了年度黑麦草种子库。总体上草亚洲司草是最有效的治疗方法,每年黑麦草种子银行低于40粒种子M〜(2)和豆科含量,在20%低于20%,在建立年份,在非的第三年中大于90% - 阶段阶段。结果表明,介绍非作物阶段可以为减少杂草种子堤,并最大限度地减少杂草对后续作物的对照影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号