首页> 外文会议>Australian Weeds Conferences >Predicting the economic benefits and costs of introducing new biological control agents for Scotch broom Cytisus scoparius into New Zealand: how much will biological control of broom harm the New Zealand beekeeping industry?
【24h】

Predicting the economic benefits and costs of introducing new biological control agents for Scotch broom Cytisus scoparius into New Zealand: how much will biological control of broom harm the New Zealand beekeeping industry?

机译:预测将苏格兰扫帚Cytisus Scoparius引入新西兰的新生物控制剂的经济效益和成本:扫帚伤害新西兰养蜂业的生物控制将多少钱?

获取原文

摘要

A recent estimate of the potential benefits and costs of introducing additional biological control agents against the European shrub Scotch broom Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link (Fabaceae), henceforth broom, into New Zealand predicted an annual net benefit of dollar 10.13 million, should broom be completely controlled. However, costs may be incurred by beekeepers and from non-target attack to tagasaste (tree lucerne, Cytisus proliferus L.f), an exotic relative of broom used as a minor fodder crop and, occasionally, for erosion control on marginal hill country. Due to uncertainties regarding these costs, a risk-averse approach was adopted by assuming non-target damage to tagasaste will be similar to damage to broom and that no pollen sources suitable forbeekeeping will replace broom stands. Work to refine these estimates by determining the potential impact of reduced broom pollen availability on honeybees was conducted in New Zealand and preliminary results are reported here. Pollen availability variedconsiderably between sites. At two of the three sites, only a minority of broom flowers were pollinated, indicating that even large reductions in pollen availability (>60% reduction in flowers) should not adversely affect honeybees. However, at one site80% of broom flowers were pollinated, indicating even a minor reduction (25%) in broom pollen might affect honeybees. Nevertheless, at all sites, other sources of pollen growing in close proximity to broom were utilised by honeybees. If these alternative pollen sources increase in abundance, should biological control of broom succeed, this should mitigate the impacts of a reduction in broom pollen availability for honeybees. This study, therefore, indicates the potential impact of successful biologicalcontrol of broom is likely to be less than previously supposed. Finally, the only species capable of pollinating broom flowers were introduced bees (mainly honeybees), indicating that introduced pollinators are at least partially responsible for the invasiveness of broom in New Zealand.
机译:最近对欧洲灌木苏格兰扫帚扫帚(Bubaceae)的潜在效益和成本引入欧洲灌木扫帚Cytisus(Fabaceae),从此扫帚,进入新西兰,预计每年1013万美元的净利润,应该是扫帚完全控制。然而,成本可能由养蜂人和非目标攻击到Tagasaste(树苜蓿,Cytisus proLiferus L.F),扫帚的异国情调相对于较小的饲料作物,偶尔在边缘山国家对侵蚀控制。由于对这些成本的不确定性,通过假设非目标损失对Tagasaste的损害采用了风险厌恶的方法,这将类似于扫帚的损坏,并且没有适用于预备笔的花粉来源将取代扫帚站。通过确定在新西兰进行的蜂窝花粉可用性减少的扫帚花粉可用性的潜在影响,在新西兰进行的潜在影响,并在此报告初步结果。花粉可用性在网站之间变化。在这三个地点中的两个群体中,只有少数繁殖的扫帚花,表明花粉可用性(花卉减少> 60%减少)不会对蜜蜂产生不利影响。然而,在一个Site80%的扫帚花上授粉,表明扫帚花粉中的轻微减少(25%)可能会影响蜜蜂。然而,在所有网站上,蜜蜂利用了邻近扫帚的其他花粉来源。如果这些替代花粉源增加丰富,应该成功的生物控制,这应该减轻蜜蜂减少扫帚花粉可用性的影响。因此,这项研究表明,成功的生物控制扫帚的潜在影响可能低于先前假设。最后,唯一能够授予扫帚花的物种被引入蜜蜂(主要是蜜蜂),表明推出的粉碎机至少部分负责新西兰扫帚的侵犯。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号