首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Atmospheric and Ocean Optics: Atmospheric Physics >The comparison of standard and swarm D-layer ionosphere models on the simulation of the x-ray solar flare response
【24h】

The comparison of standard and swarm D-layer ionosphere models on the simulation of the x-ray solar flare response

机译:标准和群D层电离层模型对X射线太阳耀斑反应模拟的比较

获取原文

摘要

The contemporary study of the global change of the atmosphere raise up the problem of models verification, namely, we need the quantified metric to compare models. One of such simple approach is to use the evidence on VLF-LF propagation under the X-ray solar flares. Any flare impacts on the middle atmosphere up to 60 km altitude. Its signature in amplitude record is clear and identifiable. We have a variety of radio paths and any season (or even year of solar cycle) in database. All aforementioned arguments make the strong basis for the model check. The response of the lower ionosphere and middle atmosphere to a solar flare depends on the quality of the source term definition and on the correctness of the chemical processes description. Different approaches are known for the derivation of X-ray excess ionization, varying from classic approach to huge Monte Carlo simulations. We elaborated the numerical model which is combined from an empirical model of ionization (GOES X-ray measurements) and numerical VLF propagation code. It successfully reproduced the first phase of the lower ionosphere response to the extremely strong solar X-flare (X9.9) September 06, 2017. Meanwhile, the decay phase was overestimated. Thus we decided to improve the ionosphere model and compare our model with other popular ionization schemes under the flares of various class. Moreover, all ionospheric models under analysis were realised in two modes: the standard mode with constant chemical rates and in the swarm mode with rates dependence on the altitude and ionization rate. The latter have been received in 70-s from complex kinetic simulations of the high altitude nuclear explosion impact on the ionosphere. We expected the improvement of results for intense flares and we wanted to check the quality of contemporary and old ionosphere models on the modern data. The results prove that (a) all models failed under empirical model of ionization; (b) the most promising model is IDG5 in swarm mode; (c) the problem of the minor neutrals is overestimated.
机译:当代研究全球变化的大气变化提高了模型验证的问题,即,我们需要量化的指标来比较模型。这种简单的方法之一是使用X射线太阳能耀斑下的VLF-LF传播上的证据。任何耀斑对中间大气层的影响高达60公里。其幅度记录中的签名是清晰可识别的。我们在数据库中拥有各种无线电路径和任何季节(甚至是太阳循环年)。所有上述争论都为模型检查提供了强有力的基础。较低电离层和中大气到太阳耀斑的响应取决于源期限定义的质量和化学过程的正确性描述。已知不同的方法用于衍生X射线过量电离,从经典方法到巨大的蒙特卡罗模拟。我们详细说明了与电离的经验模型(GESS X射线测量)和数值VLF传播码组合的数值模型。它成功地再现了2017年9月6日至9月6日极其强大的太阳X-Flare(X9.9)的较低电离层反应的第一阶段。同时,衰变阶段高估了。因此,我们决定改善电离层模型,并将我们的模型与各种阶级耀斑下的其他流行电离方案进行比较。此外,在两种模式中实现了分析的所有电离层模型:标准模式具有恒定的化学速率和群体模式,具有对高度和电离率的速率依赖性。后者已于70-S中收到70-s,从复合动力学模拟对电离层的高海拔核爆炸的影响。我们预期改善强烈耀斑的结果,我们希望检查现代数据的当代和旧电离层模型的质量。结果证明(a)所有模型在电离的经验模型下失败; (b)最有前途的模型是群体模式的IDG5; (c)未估计的次要中性的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号