首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Structural Engineering for Young Experts >EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH OF FOUR DIFFERENT MODELS OF CAST-INPLACE RC FRAMES SUBJECTED TO A VERTICAL LOAD
【24h】

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH OF FOUR DIFFERENT MODELS OF CAST-INPLACE RC FRAMES SUBJECTED TO A VERTICAL LOAD

机译:对垂直载荷进行四种不同模型的四种不同型号的实验研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A cast-in-place RC frame structure subjected to a uniformly distributed vertical load was investigated. The structure was designed by four different calculation methods, namely, the solid,truss, truss-shell and optimization models. Different from any other joint subassemblies, the specimenhere is a whole structure which is a single layer, bidirectional, three-span with 1/3 scale. Moreover, it is a conventional beam with secondary beam structure. The capacity of the structure is verified; the beam and slab crack patterns are illustrated; the load-strain responses are compared; and the contradiction of Strong Column Weak Beam philosophy with the actual failure mode is analyzed. The origin of this inconsistency is mainly attributed to slab monolithically connected to the surrounding beams. So in order to attain a Strong Column Weak Beam yielding sequence, the contribution of slabs can't be neglected. After the comparison, the solid design method is found being superior to the other three design methods. Finally, some suggestions are listed for the beam design work to reach a rational structural failure mode.
机译:研究了经受均匀分布的垂直载荷进行均匀分布的垂直载荷的地置RC框架结构。该结构由四种不同的计算方法设计,即固体,桁架,桁架壳和优化模型。与任何其他关节子组件不同,样本是一个整体结构,它是单层,双向,三跨,三跨,具有1/3级。此外,它是具有二次梁结构的传统光束。验证了结构的能力;示出了光束和板坯裂纹图案;比较负载应变响应;分析了强柱弱梁哲学与实际失效模式的矛盾。这种不一致的起源主要归因于单片连接到周围光束的板坯。因此,为了获得强柱弱光束产生序列,不能忽略板坯的贡献。比较后,发现固体设计方法优于其他三种设计方法。最后,列出了一些建议,以达到合理结构故障模式的梁设计工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号