首页> 外文会议>International Workshop on Cardiac Arrhythmias >Mechanical/Surgical Revascularization in Patients with Ventricular Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease: Is It Enough, or Do We Also Need an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator?
【24h】

Mechanical/Surgical Revascularization in Patients with Ventricular Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease: Is It Enough, or Do We Also Need an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator?

机译:心室颤动和冠状动脉疾病患者的机械/手术血运重建:它是否足够,或者我们还需要一种植入的心脏病除颤器吗?

获取原文

摘要

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) affects around 300,000-450,000 people annually in the USA, representing around 50(percent) of all cardiac deaths. Patients with a medical history of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) run a high risk of death in the short term, and studies dating back to the 1970s have shown a 45(percent) mortality rate at 2 years. SCD accounts for at least 50(percent) of patient deaths from heart failure and ischemia. From 1980 onward the positive effects of automatic implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) in secondary prevention of SCD began to be recognized, but the suspicion that the ICD was only able to change death from sudden to expected in those patients who were too compromised to benefit from therapies other than chemotherapy caused a certain skepticism.
机译:心脏病(SCD)在美国每年患约300,000-450,000人的影响,代表所有心脏死亡的50(百分比)。患有心室心动过速(VT)或心室颤动(VF)的病史的患者在短期内运行了高死亡风险,并且可以追溯到20世纪70年代的研究显示了25(百分比)死亡率。 SCD占心力衰竭和缺血的患者死亡至少50(百分比)。从1980年开始,自动植入的心脏除颤器(ICD)在SCD中的二级预防中的积极影响开始被认可,但怀疑ICD只能在那些过于受益于受益的那些患者中从突然改变死亡。除化疗以外的疗法引起了一定的怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号