首页> 外文会议>Annual Conference of the International Society for the Systems Sciences >UNIVERSITY SYSTEM AND INDUSTRIAL COMPETITIVENESS - SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE ON LINKAGE OF U.-INDUSTRY
【24h】

UNIVERSITY SYSTEM AND INDUSTRIAL COMPETITIVENESS - SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE ON LINKAGE OF U.-INDUSTRY

机译:大学制度与工业竞争力 - 系统透视U.行业联系的透视

获取原文

摘要

Japan's economic recession has been lasted for more than a decade. Many researches addressed a series of fundamental issues on the nature of the sustained recession and how to revitalizing its industrial competitiveness and suggested pertinent institutional reforms [Kameoka, 1999; MITI, 2000]. Among these issues Japan's higher education (public tertiary education) exposed to the widespread dissatisfaction from the society. The latest IMD's annual report even ranked Japan's university education in the final place among the 47 nations surveyed for nation's competitiveness. It partially reflected people's subjective perceptions on the reality of university education within the nation's educational infrastructure that could not meet the needs of the second largest economy and their strong desires for better output of higher education system. Porter and Takeuchi [1999] pointed out that the universities are responsible for the many of uncompetitive industries in providing qualified graduates and producing original researches. Japanese university system has long been perplexing people. In Japan, university system is perceived as an important institution but it differs from U.S.A. and European countries in a number of major aspects. Japanese universities have been regarded only as providers of human resources by corporations for their own in-house research centers and production sites rather than as places to go to have research done [Low and Nakayama, 1999]. Japanese miracle to some extent benefited from the steady supply of specialized engineers by universities or colleges. Japanese education and training was believed as one of the most highly educated workforce in the world [Stainer, 1995]. When Japanese economy toke off in the 1960s and later reached growth peak in the 1970s, Elite bureaucrats and businessmen dominated policy-making [Lincoln, 1993]. Universities were further treated as devices screening potential employee as well as pre-educational units for economic organizations. Nevertheless, as one of three research instruments, Japanese universities unlike American counterparts have difficulty to compete with corporate research laboratories and national research institutions that belong to ministries of government [Nakayama and Low, 1997].
机译:日本的经济衰退已持续十多年。许多研究讨论了一系列关于持续经济衰退的性质的一系列基本问题,以及如何振兴其产业竞争力和建议相关的制度改革[kameoka,1999; Miti,2000]。在这些问题中,日本的高等教育(公共高等教育)暴露于社会的广泛不满。最新的IMD的年度报告甚至在为国家竞争力调查的47个国家的决赛中排名日本的大学教育。它部分反映了人们对国家教育内部教育现实的主观看法,无法满足第二大经济体的需求及其强大的高等教育系统的强烈愿望。 Porter和Takeuchi [1999]指出,大学负责许多非竞争力行业提供合格的毕业生并产生原创研究。日本大学系统长期以来一直令人困惑。在日本,大学系统被认为是一个重要的机构,但它与U.S.A.和欧洲国家的一些主要方面不同。日本大学仅被视为由公司为自己的内部研究中心和生产基地的人力资源提供商而不是参加研究的地方[Low和Nakayama,1999]。日本奇迹在某种程度上受益于大学或大学的专业工程师的稳定供应。日语教育和培训被认为是世界上最受教育最高的劳动力之一[Stainer,1995]。当日本经济在20世纪60年代和后来达到20世纪70年代的增长高峰时,Elite官僚和商人占主导地位的政策制作[林肯,1993]。大学被进一步被视为筛选潜在员工的设备以及经济组织的教育专业单位。尽管如此,作为三个研究仪器之一,日本大学不同,与美国同行不同,难以与属于政府部门的企业研究实验室和国家研究机构竞争[Nakayama和Low,1997]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号