首页> 外文会议>Annual Conference of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety >Comparison of danger and caution sign standards for U. S. workplaces
【24h】

Comparison of danger and caution sign standards for U. S. workplaces

机译:危险与谨慎符号标准的比较

获取原文

摘要

This paper compares the three most significant standards for safety signs used in occupational environments in the United States. Two of the standards are regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The third standard is from the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Signs compared are the familiar danger and caution signs. The first comparison was the basis for determining whether a danger sign or a caution sign is appropriate for a particular hazard. The OSHA standards are based on a single criterion - whether the hazard is an immediate or potential threat. The ANSI standard is more complex, using three criteria. Another disadvantage of the ANSI standard is there are many hazardous situations for which neither a danger nor caution sign is appropriate. The second comparison was the signal word panel format. The ANSI standard has preferred and alternate formats for danger and for caution signs. Employers may use the preferred format for danger signs without violating OSHA requirements. However, employers must use the alternate format for caution signs in order to comply with OSHA.
机译:本文比较了美国职业环境中使用的三种最重要的安全标准。两个标准是职业安全和健康管理局(OSHA)的规定。第三标准来自美国国家标准研究所(ANSI)。迹象是比较的是熟悉的危险和警告标志。第一个比较是确定危险标志或小心符号是否适合特定危险的基础。 OSHA标准基于单一标准 - 危害是立即或潜在的威胁。使用三个标准,ANSI标准更复杂。 ANSI标准的另一个缺点是存在许多危险情况,既不是危险性也不适合迹象。第二个比较是信号字面板格式。 ANSI标准首选和备用格式,危险和警告标志。雇主可以在不违反OSHA要求的情况下使用危险标志的首选格式。但是,雇主必须使用备用格式进行警告标志,以符合OSHA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号