【24h】

Initial Assessment of Precision Approach Guidance Quality

机译:精密方法引导质量的初步评估

获取原文

摘要

A methodology for assessing the impact of jamming and anti-jam (AJ) technology on the guidance quality of a precision aircraft landing system is presented. The approach has two distinct components. The first component assesses the performance of the AJ processing; capturing characteristics required for evaluation of system level guidance quality. The second component incorporates these AJ characterizations in the determination of precision aircraft landing system guidance quality. This first order analysis is geared toward getting early results to establish the relative significance of jamming and anti-jam technology. The paper clearly describes simplifying assumptions and their impact as well as providing suggestions for increased fidelity models. Results based on these simple models show the impact of jamming and anti-jam technology on guidance quality. The first step evaluates space-time adaptive processing (STAP) performance for a given threat description, producing a carrier-to-noise-density (C/N{sub}0) skymap. An C/N{sub}0 skymap portrays the C/N{sub}0 at a GPS receiver as a function of satellite azimuth and elevation angle. The C/N{sub}0 skymap approach allows the jammer threat, and AJ response to be determined independent of the latitude and longitude of the landing. In this way, a set of C/N{sub}0 skymaps can be used to assess guidance quality at any landing site. Guidance quality is based on an extension of availability as defined in RTCA DO-245 for LAAS, and is determined as a function of accuracy, integrity and continuity. As the constellation cycles, the satellites available for navigation are culled based on (1) elevation mask, (2) C/N{sub}0 loss-of-lock failure as determined by the anti-jam C/N{sub}0 skymap, (3) differential requirement for simultaneous air and ground satellite visibility, and (4) satellite faults. The remaining "visible" satellites are then used to calculate vertical and lateral accuracy, and the vertical and lateral alarm limits used in the determination of availability. This two-step approach allows parametric studies based on the state-5 loss-of-lock threshold assumption, satellite fault models, integrity risk, number of satellites in the constellation, jammer configurations and strengths, and anti-jam technology. This first order study was geared toward early identification of the impact that jamming and AJ have on guidance quality. A simple (optimistic) model followed by successively refined, greater fidelity models allows early identification of critical aspects allowing appropriate attention to be focused on critical issues.
机译:提出了一种评估干扰和抗堵塞(AJ)技术对精密飞机着陆系统的引导质量的影响的方法。该方法具有两个不同的组件。第一个组件评估AJ处理的性能;捕获系统级引导质量评估所需的特性。第二个组件在确定精密航空器着陆系统引导质量时结合了这些AJ特征。第一个订单分析旨在获得早期结果,以确定干扰和抗堵塞技术的相对意义。本文清楚地描述了简化假设及其影响以及为增加保真机构的建议提供建议。基于这些简单模型的结果显示了干扰和抗堵塞技术对引导质量的影响。第一步评估给定威胁描述的时空自适应处理(STAP)性能,产生载波噪声密度(C / N {Sub} 0)Skymap。 C / N {Sub} 0 SkyMAP将GPS接收器的C / N {Sub} 0描绘为卫星方位角和仰角的函数。 C / N {Sub} 0 Skymap方法允许Jammer威胁,以及独立于登陆的纬度和经度确定的AJ响应。以这种方式,可以使用一组C / N {Sub} 0 SkyMaps来评估任何着陆位点的引导质量。引导质量基于LAAS中定义的可用性的扩展,并确定为准确性,完整性和连续性的函数。作为星座周期,可用于导航的卫星基于(1)升降掩模,(2)C / N {Sub} 0锁定失去锁定失败,如抗卡纸C / N} 0所确定的Skymap,(3)同时空气和地面卫星可视性的差分要求,以及(4)卫星故障。然后使用剩余的“可见”卫星来计算垂直和横向精度,以及用于确定可用性的垂直和横向警报限制。这两步方法允许基于锁定阈值假设,卫星故障模型,完整性风险,星座中的卫星的数量,干扰配置和强度和抗堵塞技术的参数研究。第一份订单研究旨在早期确定干扰和AJ对指导质量的影响。一种简单的(乐观)模型,然后是连续改进,更大的保真模型允许早期确定关键方面,允许适当地关注关键问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号