首页> 外文会议>MEDINFO >Network Analysis of Citation in Hypertension Clinical Guidelines
【24h】

Network Analysis of Citation in Hypertension Clinical Guidelines

机译:高血压临床指南引用网络分析

获取原文

摘要

Recently the two most influential clinical guideline were published for diagnosing and treating hypertension in US and Europe: 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) Guideline. Though both of them have most in common, the differences in details between guidelines have confused many clinicians in the world. Because guidelines were evidence- based literature, through the analysis of articles cited in guidelines, these similarities and differences could be explained. Bibliometric analysis is a method of quantifying the contents of literature to analyze literature. So using the bibliometric analysis including co-citation network analysis, articles cited in guideline were analyzed. As a result, we figured out that bibliometrics can analyze the influence of the countries, authors and studies on the guidelines, which might affect on the similarities and the differences between both guidelines.
机译:最近,这两种最具影响力的临床指南被公布用于诊断和治疗美国和欧洲的高血压:2017年美国心脏病学/美国心脏协会(ACC / AHA)和2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会(ESC / ESH)指南。虽然这两个人都有最共同的,但指南之间的细节的差异困惑了世界上许多临床医生。由于指南是基于证据的文学,通过对指南中引用的文章的分析,可以解释这些相似之处和差异。伯格计数分析是量化文献含量分析文学的方法。因此,使用包括协同网络分析的生物计量分析,分析了指南中引用的文章。因此,我们弄明白,圣经统计学可以分析各国,作者和研究对指南的影响,这可能影响两种准则之间的相似之处和差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号