首页> 外文会议>Biennial Conference of the Australasian Pig Science Association >What does the 'closed herd' really mean for Australian breeding companies and their customers?
【24h】

What does the 'closed herd' really mean for Australian breeding companies and their customers?

机译:“封闭的牧群”对澳大利亚养殖公司及其客户来说真正意味着什么?

获取原文

摘要

The perception that the genetic background of the Australian pig population is limiting for genetic improvement of commercial pigs in Australia is considered in the context of well established theory combined with practical evidence. The diversity ofpig breeds used in modern commercial pig-breeding programs is diminished worldwide relative to all the pig breeds available. Australia is no different in this respect. The use of predominantly three main breeds (Large White, Landrace, Duroc) and synthetic lines, with contiibutions from other minor breeds to form the basis of a cross-breeding system for commercial pig production is well established internationally. The Australian concern of relatively small founder populations is potentially of relevance, from a theoretical perspective, for (1) the prevalence of defects or the presence of desirable alleles, and (2) the loss of genetic variation or increase in inbreeding depression resulting from increased inbreeding in closed nucleus lines, potentiallyreducing response to selection. However, rates of response achieved in Australian herds are generally commensurate with the performance recording and selection emphasis applied, and do not appear to be unduly restricted. Moreover, favourable alleles present in unrepresented breeds are frequently present in the three major breeds elsewhere, and therefore would be expected to be present within the Australian populations. Wider testing would provide confirmation of this. Comparison of estimates of effective population size of Australian populations with experimental selection lines overseas (e.g. INRA) or other intensely selected species (e.g. Holstein cattle) suggest adequate genetic diversity to achieve ongoing genetic improvement in the Australian pigindustry. However, fitness traits should be included in breeding goals. What remains to be seen is whether novel phenotypes or genotypes are required to meet future challenges, which might be imposed by changes in the environment (e.g. climate change, disease) or market needs. Given probable overlap in genetic merit across Australian and foreign populations for unselected attributes, we suggest that sufficient genetic resources are already present in Australian herds to continue commercial progress within existing Australian populations that have adapted to Australian conditions.
机译:澳大利亚猪群的遗传背景限制了澳大利亚商业猪的遗传改善的看法在明确的理论与实际证据结合的情况下,考虑了澳大利亚商业猪的遗传改善。在现代商业猪养殖计划中使用的PIG品种的多样性相对于可用的所有猪品种,在全球范围内减少。澳大利亚在这方面没有什么不同。主要是三种主要品种(大白,Landrace,Duroc)和合成线,与其他次要品种的互动措施形成在国际上建立了商用猪生产的交叉育种系统的基础。澳大利亚对相对小的创始人群体的关注可能是潜在的相关性,从理论上的角度来看,(1)缺陷的患病率或期望的等位基因的存在,以及(2)遗传变异丧失或增加近亲繁殖的抑郁症导致闭合核线近冻结,潜在的选择响应。但是,澳大利亚畜群的响应率一般与应用的绩效记录和选择重点相称,并且似乎不会受到过度限制。此外,在其他地方的三种主要品种中,出现的有利等位基因频繁存在,因此预计将在澳大利亚人口中存在。更广泛的测试将提供对此的确认。澳大利亚人口估计与海外实验选择线(例如InRA)或其他强烈选定的物种(例如Holstein牛)的比较表明,澳大利亚Pig工业的持续遗传改善是充足的遗传多样性。但是,健身性状应包括在育种目标中。待观察是什么是新的表型或基因型需要满足未来的挑战,这可能被环境的变化(例如气候变化,疾病)或市场需求所施加。鉴于澳大利亚和外国人群的遗传优势可能重叠,我们建议澳大利亚畜群中已经存在足够的遗传资源,以便在适应澳大利亚条件的现有澳大利亚人口中继续商业进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号