首页> 外文会议>Biennial SGA-SEG meeting >Comparison of Mineral Deposits between Georgian and Turkish Sectors of the Tethyan Metallogenic Belt
【24h】

Comparison of Mineral Deposits between Georgian and Turkish Sectors of the Tethyan Metallogenic Belt

机译:格鲁吉亚与土耳其矿物质矿床矿物矿床比较

获取原文

摘要

Correlation between the Turkish and Georgian parts of the Tethyan Metallogenic Belt highlights the many similarities, particularly in the Cretaceous. VMS deposits are the most important deposit type and are largely of Kuroko-type in Turkey, although the stockwork type are predominant in Georgia, often with gold overprints. Eocene volcanics are host to vein precious metal deposits and become notably thick and alkaline immediately north of the Turkish Georgian border. Porphyry deposits appear to mainly associated with this event and contrast with the situation in Bulgaria. Other VMS deposits are associated with Jurassic volcanism and the eastern part of the area in Armenia has vein Au deposits and porphyries of Neogene age.
机译:Tethyan Metallogencic皮带的土耳其和格鲁吉亚部分之间的相关性突出了许多相似之处,特别是在白垩纪中。 VMS存款是最重要的存款类型,并且主要是土耳其的Kuroko-Type,尽管在格鲁吉亚主要是占主导地位的,通常是金叠印。农村火山岩是静脉珍贵金属矿床的主持人,并在土耳其格鲁吉亚边境北方立即变得厚度厚实且碱土。斑岩存款似乎主要与此事件相关联,与保加利亚的情况形成鲜明对比。其他VMS存款与侏罗纪山脉有关,亚美尼亚地区的东部有关,具有静脉AU沉积物和Neogene时代的卟啉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号