【24h】

POTENTIAL ERRORS IN THE FAA TEST

机译:FAA测试中的潜在错误

获取原文

摘要

One of the problems in dealing with manufactured sands is the lack of a set of tests that fully characterize the three main properties of the individual particles. The properties that we should be trying to characterize are: (1.) particle shape, (2.) particle size, (3.) particle surface texture. Not only do we need to know these individual properties of the aggregates, we need to know how these properties influence the concrete in both its hardened and plastic states. It is also desirable to understand how the properties of each of the aggregate sizes, or material types, impacts on the entire aggregate blend. Particle interactions are an issue that is not adequately addressed by the concrete standards of today. Logic should dictate that, for specifications of particle size distribution, we should be looking at the entire gradation, i.e., the sand and aggregate fractions together, so that we can with more certainty have a common-sense overall gradation in the concrete mix. The paper addresses results of a test series which evaluated the effectiveness of ASTM C 1252 for assessing fine aggregate angularity (FAA).
机译:处理制造砂的问题之一是缺乏一组测试,可完全表征各个颗粒的三个主要特性。我们应该尝试表征的属性是:(1.)粒子形状,(2.)粒度,(3)粒度纹理。我们不仅需要知道这些聚合的个人属性,我们需要知道这些属性如何影响其硬化和塑料状态的混凝土。还希望了解每个聚合大小或材料类型的性质如何影响整个聚合混合物。粒子相互作用是当今的具体标准没有充分解决的问题。逻辑应该指示,对于粒子尺寸分布的规格,我们应该看一下整个灰度,即沙子和骨料分数在一起,因此我们可以更确定地在混凝土混合中具有常见意义的整体灰度。纸张寻址测试系列的结果,其评估ASTM C 1252的有效性,用于评估细骨料角度(FAA)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号