首页> 外文会议>International Mining Geology Conference >Orebody Solid Modelling Accuracy--A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Modelling Techniques Using a Practical Example from the Hope Bay District, Nunavut, Canada
【24h】

Orebody Solid Modelling Accuracy--A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Modelling Techniques Using a Practical Example from the Hope Bay District, Nunavut, Canada

机译:矿体实体建模精度 - 从加拿大努瓦特希望湾区的实际例子进行明确和隐含建模技术的比较

获取原文

摘要

Accurate geometric models of orebodies establish the framework for reliable mineral resource estimates that provide a basis for further exploration and mine planning, as well as for financial models that ultimately determine the economic viability of a deposit. Traditional, explicit geometric modelling techniques that are utilised for resource modelling by the general mining software packages, such as MineSight~R , involve manually digitising interpreted ore outlines that must be carefully linked to create valid geometric solid models. An alternative, implicit modelling method, employed by Leapfrog? software relies on a fast method of global interpolation, which offers several advantages over traditional modelling techniques. Although previous case studies have documented the relative efficiencies of the two approaches, the accuracy of the two methods has not been previously quantified and compared. This study quantifies the accuracy of solid models created using explicit and implicit methods, and compares the differences between the models. Solid models of the Doris Hinge vein gold deposit (located in the Hope Bay district, Nunavut, Canada) are constructed from preliminary and follow-up drilling data using both modelling techniques. The accuracies of the solid models generated using preliminary drilling data are determined by measuring the 3D distance between the surface of the models and the actual contact location defined by the follow-up drilling data. Additional comparisons based on volume, cross-sectional area and surface differences were made between both phase 1 solid models and solid models constructed from phase 2 drilling information. The overall results of this study find that the MineSight~R and Leapfrog~(TM) solid model accuracies are virtually the same, and that their volume, cross-sectional area, and surface differences are comparable. This study concludes that the implicit modelling technique generates accurate solid models that can be used in place of explicit models as ore shells for resource estimation in certain circumstances.
机译:准确的矿石几何模型建立了可靠的矿产资源估计框架,为进一步探索和矿山规划提供了基础,以及最终确定存款的经济可行性的金融模式。通过普通挖掘软件包(例如Minesight〜R)使用用于资源建模的传统,明确的几何建模技术涉及手动数字化不得仔细链接以创建有效的几何实体模型的解释ORE轮廓。 LeapFrog采用的替代,隐式建模方法?软件依赖于全局插值的快速方法,这提供了与传统建模技术的若干优势。虽然之前的案例研究记录了两种方法的相对效率,但两种方法的准确性尚未被预先量化和比较。本研究量化了使用显式和隐式方法创建的实体模型的准确性,并比较模型之间的差异。 Doris Hinge Vein金矿床的实体模型(位于加拿大努纳州纳韦特,加拿大)采用初步和后续钻井数据,使用两个建模技术构建。使用初步钻井数据产生的固体模型的精度是通过测量模型表面与由后续钻探数据定义的实际接触位置之间的3D距离来确定的。基于体积,横截面积和表面差异的额外比较是在两相1固体模型和由第2阶段钻探信息构成的固体模型之间进行的。本研究的总体结果发现,Minesight〜R和跨越〜(TM)实体模型精度几乎是相同的,并且它们的体积,横截面积和表面差异是可比的。本研究得出结论,隐式建模技术可以生成准确的实体模型,可以使用在某些情况下以供资源估计的矿石壳代替显式模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号