首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds >The Myth of “cis-Stall”: Using Isotopes and Concentration Trends to Evaluate cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Degradation
【24h】

The Myth of “cis-Stall”: Using Isotopes and Concentration Trends to Evaluate cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Degradation

机译:“CIS-Stall”的神话:使用同位素和浓度趋势来评估顺式-1,2-二氯乙烯降解

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background/Objectives. Numerous investigators have taken the presence of cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cDCE) in conjunction with the absence of vinyl chloride in subsurface environments contaminated with tetrachloroethene (PCE) and/or trichloroethene (TCE) to indicate that cDCE degradation is not occurring (“cis-stall”) and therefore that some form of enhancement is necessary to facilitate bioremediation. The assumption that degradation was “stalled” at cDCE came about because the reaction that results in the production of cDCE from TCE is reductive dechlorination and during complete reductive dechlorination vinyl chloride is produced from the degradation of cDCE if the reaction proceeds uninterrupted. The lack of VC at a site led to the conclusion that cDCE was not degrading, either because there was insufficient organic carbon or because the requisite bacteria were absent. If cDCE was not degrading at such a site, then the concentration and mass of this compound should be seen to increase. This is not the case at many, if not most, sites. However, the sale of bioremediation products that enhance biodegradation through either the addition of organic carbon or an inoculum of bacteria such as Dehalococcoides has been greatly enhanced by perceived “cis-stall.” As will be shown, the use of biostimulation and/or bioaugmentation may not be necessary in many cases because the natural treatment system is indeed working to remediate the site and cDCE is simply degrading via a mechanism or mechanisms other than biological reductive dechlorination. Potential degradation mechanisms for the degradation of cDCE that do not involve biological reductive dechlorination include oxidation and abiotic degradation. In some cases biostimulation and/or bioaugmentation may actually increase the risks posed by PCE, TCE, and cDCE contamination. This is particularly true where receptors could be exposed to the more mobile and toxic vinyl chloride that is not only produced, but accumulates, during complete reductive dechlorination.
机译:背景/目标。许多研究者已经采取顺式1,2-二氯乙烯(CDCE)的存在下结合的不存在中污染有四氯乙烯(PCE)和/或三氯乙烯(TCE)地下环境氯乙烯以指示CDCE降解没有发生( “顺大排档”),因此某种形式的增强是必要的,以促进生物修复。该降解“停止”在CDCE假设出现,因为该反应的结果在从TCE生产CDCE的是还原脱氯和完整还原脱氯氯乙烯期间从CDCE的降解产生,如果反应进行不间断的。在领导的结论是CDCE不是贬低,要么是因为有有机碳不足,或因为必要的细菌缺席网站缺乏VC的。如果CDCE完全没有这样的网站降解,则该化合物的浓度和物质应该被视为增加。这是不是这种情况在许多,如果不是大多数网站。然而,销售的增强通过任一另外的有机碳或细菌如Dehalococcoides的接种物的生物降解生物修复产品已大大增强感知“顺式失速”。如将展示,利用生物刺激和/或生物强化的可能不是在许多情况下是必要的,因为自然处理系统的确努力修复该网站,CDCE通过一种机制或生物比还原脱氯等机制简单地降低。对于不涉及生物还原脱氯CDCE的降解潜在的降解机制包括氧化和非生物降解。在某些情况下,生物刺激和/或生物强化实际上可能会增加PCE,TCE,并CDCE污染所带来的风险。这是特别真实,其中受体可能会暴露在该不仅所产生的多个移动和有毒氯乙烯,但累积,完整还原脱氯期间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号