首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Neural Information Processing >A comparison of outlier detection methods: exemplified with an environmental geochemical dataset
【24h】

A comparison of outlier detection methods: exemplified with an environmental geochemical dataset

机译:异常检测方法的比较:举例说明了环境地球化学数据集

获取原文

摘要

Three outlier detection methods of range, principle component analysis (PCA), and autoassociation neural network (AutoNN) approaches are introduced and applied to an environmental geochemical dataset in Sweden. Each method uses a different criterion for the definition of outlier. In the range method, the number of outlying values of one sample is determined as the outlying sample measurement parameter. The distance of sample scores in the principal components from the coordinate origin is suggested as the parameter for the PCA method. The total sum of error squares between the measured and predicted values is proposed as the parameter for the AutoNN approach. The results of the three methods are comparable, but differences exist. A combination of all the methods is recommended for the development of a better outlier identifier, and further analyses on the detected outliers should be carried out by integrating geological and environmental information.
机译:引入了三种异常检测方法,主要成分分析(PCA)和自动关联神经网络(Autonn)方法,并应用于瑞典的环境地球化学数据集。每个方法都使用不同的标准来定义异常值。在范围方法中,将一个样本的偏远值的数量被确定为偏远的样本测量参数。从坐标原点的主组件中的样本分数的距离被建议为PCA方法的参数。提出了测量值和预测值之间的误差方格总和作为Autonn方法的参数。三种方法的结果是可比的,但存在差异。建议为开发更好的异常值标识符的所有方法的组合,并通过整合地质和环境信息来进行检测到的异常值的进一步分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号