首页> 外文会议>IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Annual Conference >Comparison of mammography and breast infrared imaging: sensitivity, specificity; false negatives, false positives, positive predictive value and negative predictive value
【24h】

Comparison of mammography and breast infrared imaging: sensitivity, specificity; false negatives, false positives, positive predictive value and negative predictive value

机译:乳房X线照相和乳房红外成像的比较:敏感性,特异性;假否定,误报,阳性预测值和负面预测值

获取原文

摘要

Breast infrared imaging (IRI) for detection of breast cancer has been unfairly maligned as having unacceptably high false positive and false negative rates. IRI actually has statistical performance characteristics that are similar to mammography.The false positive rate of 14% is about twice as high as mammography but surgical intervention is not possible (no increase in invasive procedures). Also, the false negatives of IRI do not hinder the detection of breast cancer by physical exam,mammography and ultrasound. Finally, the ability of IRI to predict who will develop breast cancer is not appreciated and IRI results should be used to select patients for prevention trials.
机译:用于检测乳腺癌的乳房红外成像(IRI)被不公平地诽谤,具有不可接受的高假阳性和假负率。 IRI实际上具有与乳房X线照相相似的统计性能特征。假阳性率为14%是乳房X线照相术的两倍,但手术干预是不可能的(侵入性手术的增加)。此外,IRI的假阴性不会阻碍通过体检,乳房X线照相术和超声检测乳腺癌。最后,IRI预测谁将产生乳腺癌的能力是不理解的,并且IRI结果应用于选择患者进行预防试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号