首页> 外文会议>International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles >REPEATABILITY OF THE NHTSA VISUAL-MANUAL GUIDELINES ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
【24h】

REPEATABILITY OF THE NHTSA VISUAL-MANUAL GUIDELINES ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE

机译:NHTSA Visual-Manigal指南评估程序的可重复性

获取原文

摘要

The Visual-Manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-Vehicle Electronic Devices includes the Eye Glance Measurement Using Driving Simulator Testing (EGDS) task acceptance test. This paper describes the outcome of two EGDS tests, where both tests assessed the same set of 10 in-vehicle tasks, though each test employed a different group of 24 test participants, randomly sampled according to the proscribed EGDS procedure. Thus, in total 48 test participants drove on a simulated motorway in a lead vehicle following scenario while performing tasks such as changing temperature, setting destination in the navigation system and selecting and playing music using a prototype in-vehicle infotainment system located on the center panel. When comparing the test outcomes between the two groups, it was found that for 6 of the 10 tested tasks, pass/fail outcomes differed between the two groups on one or more of the proposed criteria. This high level of inconsistency in outcome between two identical tests using ten identical tasks raises questions regarding the repeatability of the proposed NHTSA EGDS procedure.
机译:用于车载电子设备的视觉手册NHTSA驱动器分散指南包括使用驾驶模拟器测试(EGDS)任务验收测试的眼睛浏览。本文介绍了两个EGDS测试的结果,其中两个测试评估了相同的10个车载任务,尽管每个测试都采用了不同的24个测试参与者,根据可检测的EGDS程序随机取样。因此,总共48个测试参与者在方案之后在铅车辆中开辟了模拟的高速公路,同时执行诸如改变温度,在导航系统中设定目的地的任务,使用位于中心面板上的原型内信息娱乐系统选择和播放音乐。当比较两组之间的测试结果时,发现对于10个测试任务中的6个,在一个或多个提出的标准上的两组之间的通过/失败结果不同。使用十个相同任务的两个相同测试之间的结果在结果中的这种高度不一致提出了关于所提出的NHTSA EGDS程序的可重复性的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号