首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Principles and Practice of constraint Programming >MAC and Combined Heuristics: Two Reasons to Forsake FC (and CBJ?) on Hard Problems
【24h】

MAC and Combined Heuristics: Two Reasons to Forsake FC (and CBJ?) on Hard Problems

机译:MAC和综合启发式:在艰难问题上forsake fc(和cbj?)的两个原因

获取原文

摘要

In the last twenty years, many algorithms and heuristics were devel-oped to find solutions in constraint networks. Their number increased to such an extent that it quickly became necessary to compare their performances in order to propose a small number of "good" methods. These comparisons often led us to consider FC or FC-CBJ associated with a "minimum domain" variable ordering heuristic as the best techniques to solve a wide variety of constraint networks. In this paper, we first try to convince once and for all the CSP community that MAC is not only more efficient than FC to solve large practical problems, but it is also really more efficient than FC on hard and large random problems. Afterwards, we introduce an original and efficient way to combine variable ordering heuristics. Finally, we conjecture that when a good variable ordering heuristic is used, CBJ becomes an expensive gadget which almost always slows down the search, even if it saves a few constraint checks.
机译:在过去的二十年中,开发了许多算法和启发式,以找到在约束网络中的解决方案。他们的号码增加到这种程度,即它很快就开始比较他们的性能,以提出少量“好”方法。这些比较通常导致我们考虑与“最小域”变量相关的FC或FC-CBJ,作为解决各种约束网络的最佳技术。在本文中,我们首先尝试致力于一次,对于所有CSP社区来说,MAC不仅比FC更效率来解决大型实际问题,而且在艰难和大规模的随机问题上也比FC更有效。之后,我们介绍了一种原创有效的方法来组合可变排序启发式。最后,我们猜想使用良好的可变排序启发式,CBJ成为一个昂贵的小工具,即使它节省了几个约束检查,几乎总是减慢搜索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号