首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction >Evaluating Usability-Supporting Architecture Patterns: Reactions from Usability Professionals
【24h】

Evaluating Usability-Supporting Architecture Patterns: Reactions from Usability Professionals

机译:评估可用性支持架构模式:可用性专业人员的反应

获取原文

摘要

Usability professionals and software engineers approach software design differently, which creates a communication gap that hinders effective usability design discussions. An online survey was conducted to evaluate how usability professionals react to Usability-Supporting Architecture Patterns (USAPs) as a potential way to bridge this gap. Members of the Usability Professionals Association (UPA) participated in a pretest-posttest control group design experiment where they answered questions about USAPs and software design. Results suggest that participants perceived USAPs as useful to account for usability in software architectures, recognizing the importance of the USAPs stated usability benefits. Additionally, results showed a difference in perception of the USAPs stated usability benefits between US and European participants. A better understanding of what the usability community thinks about USAPs can lead to their improvement as well as increased adoption by software engineers, which can lead to better integration of usability and HCI principles into software design.
机译:可用性专业人员和软件工程师使用不同的设计软件设计,这会产生妨碍有效的可用性设计讨论的通信介面。进行了在线调查,以评估可用性专业人员对可用性支持架构模式(USAP)作为弥合这一差距的潜在方法。可用性专业人员协会的成员(UPA)参加了一个预测试的后测试组设计实验,在那里他们回答了关于USAPS和软件设计的问题。结果表明,参与者认为使用占软件架构中可用性的有用性,以认识到USAPS表明可用性福利的重要性。此外,结果表明,对美国和欧洲参与者之间的USAPS表达的可用性利益的看法显示出来的差异。更好地了解可用性社区对USAP的考虑可以导致他们的改进以及通过软件工程师的采用增加,这可能会更好地将可用性和HCI原则集成到软件设计中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号