首页> 外文会议>Conference on Ophthalmic Technologies >Is the Optic Disc Tilt Angle Different in Myopia?
【24h】

Is the Optic Disc Tilt Angle Different in Myopia?

机译:近视眼的视盘倾斜角度不同吗?

获取原文

摘要

Optic disc tilt (ODT), peripapillary atrophy (PPA), and abnormally large or small optic discs are the earliest known changes in myopic eyes and may precede the development of pathological myopia. Increasing ODT and distance between the macula and optic nerve head have been reported as being associated with progressive myopia. Therefore, it is important to segment and quantify the ODT accurately. Using a newly developed automated image processing method we measured the ODT in both myopes and emmetropes. We determined the ODT from myopic eyes (n= 90) and compared the results with emmetropia (n=14). All 104 optical coherence tomography (OCT) images had dimensions of 200×200 pixels corresponding to 6mm × 6mm. The myopic OCT images were labeled based on a severity scale based on the spherical error (SE) as low (-0.5 to -3.00 D SE), moderate (-3.12 to -6.00 D SE), high (-6.12 to -9.00 D SE), and very high (worse than -9.00 D SE) using standard myopia classifications. Each OCT image was segmented by a clinician (CEM) and by the newly proposed method (NAM). The NAM used 8-bit grayscale OCT images which was preprocessed by applying Gaussian blur and Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization based thresholding to remove noise and locate regions of interest. Then the images were split into two halves to fit straight lines separately. Morphological erosion and dilation were performed on the images to remove artifacts. They were tested with three combinations of erosion and dilation iterations. Univariate linear regression Lines were fit to trace the white band on each half and angle between the lines was determined. Both the methods showed higher horizontal ODT than vertical. The mean ± SD horizontal ODT (in degrees) in the myopic eye was 18.47 ± 7.67 and 15.84± 6.61 by the NAM and CEM methods. The vertical ODT in the myopic eyes (in degrees) was 16.32 ± 7.10, and 14.52 ± 7.05 by the NAM and CEM methods respectively. However, the NAM showed a maximum difference (2.26 ± 5.68) between horizontal and vertical ODT. The study results show that the ODT in very high myopic eyes (26.33±8.99)is significantly different (p<0.05) when compared to emmetropic eyes (19.47±3.99).
机译:视盘倾斜(ODT)、毛细血管周围萎缩(PPA)和异常大或小的视盘是已知的近视眼最早的变化,可能先于病理性近视的发展。据报道,ODT和黄斑与视神经头之间的距离增加与进行性近视有关。因此,准确地分割和量化ODT非常重要。使用一种新开发的自动图像处理方法,我们测量了近视眼和正视眼的ODT。我们测定了近视眼(n=90)的ODT,并将结果与正视眼(n=14)进行了比较。所有104张光学相干断层扫描(OCT)图像的尺寸均为200×200像素,对应于6mm×6mm。根据标准近视分类,近视OCT图像根据球面误差(SE)的严重程度分为低(-0.5至-3.00 D SE)、中等(-3.12至-6.00 D SE)、高(-6.12至-9.00 D SE)和非常高(比-9.00 D SE更差)。每个OCT图像由临床医生(CEM)和新提出的方法(NAM)分割。NAM使用8位灰度OCT图像,通过应用高斯模糊和基于对比度限制的自适应直方图均衡化阈值进行预处理,以去除噪声并定位感兴趣区域。然后将图像分成两半,分别拟合直线。对图像进行形态学侵蚀和扩张以去除伪影。他们用侵蚀和膨胀迭代的三种组合进行了测试。拟合单变量线性回归线以追踪每一半上的白色带,并确定线之间的角度。两种方法的水平ODT均高于垂直ODT。通过NAM和CEM方法,近视眼的平均±SD水平ODT(以度为单位)分别为18.47±7.67和15.84±6.61。通过NAM和CEM方法,近视眼的垂直ODT(度数)分别为16.32±7.10和14.52±7.05。然而,NAM显示水平和垂直ODT之间的最大差异(2.26±5.68)。研究结果表明,与正视眼(19.47±3.99)相比,高度近视眼(26.33±8.99)的ODT显著不同(p<0.05)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号